Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tamar1973

Is there any reason a doctor could not perform a caesarian section in the scenario and deliver a life baby instead? Doctors probably do C sections all the time when a mother’s health is at risk.


14 posted on 04/18/2007 6:07:28 PM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Cecily
Is there any reason a doctor could not perform a caesarian section in the scenario and deliver a life baby instead? Doctors probably do C sections all the time when a mother’s health is at risk.

Maybe seeing the baby alive would be too traumatic for the mother so it's better to kill it?! I can't see any reason why a C-section wouldn't work except for the fact that the woman then would see the child and have a permanent reminder of it as a scar on her belly and we all know that not leaving a scar on her belly is more important than saving the life of a child. /sarcasm!

17 posted on 04/18/2007 6:09:02 PM PDT by Tamar1973 (Every Thread a BYJ Thread (http://www.byj.co.kr/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Cecily

Nope. I have as a physician tried to think of anything that could cause this procedure to be done for the life or health of the mother and have come up with NONE. The only reason to not deliver the child alive at the point it is killed is to KILL it. It is that simple. This is a step in the right direction but just a small step. It only make a certain procedure illegal not 3rd trimester abortions.


52 posted on 04/18/2007 9:57:52 PM PDT by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson