Skip to comments.
Summary of Partial-Birth Ruling
bench.nationalreview.com ^
| 4-18-2007
| Ed Whelan
Posted on 04/18/2007 9:09:18 AM PDT by bedolido
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
04/18/2007 9:09:19 AM PDT
by
bedolido
To: bedolido
Justice Ginsburgs dissent Rudy's ideal judge.
2
posted on
04/18/2007 9:11:02 AM PDT
by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: madprof98
3
posted on
04/18/2007 9:14:00 AM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: bedolido
Rush going over this now. Since the Chief Justice selects the justice to write the opinion, why did he select Kennedy?
4
posted on
04/18/2007 9:15:36 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
Funny that the CJ did not recuse himself, being catholic and all, he really did not have a choice in the matter.
To: epluribus_2
Funny that the CJ did not recuse himself, being catholic and all, he really did not have a choice in the matter. What a bizarre thing to say.
6
posted on
04/18/2007 9:26:46 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(FRED!)
To: Petronski
I think epluribus2 was being sarcastic
To: bedolido
The Court blurs the line between pre-viability and post-viability.You mean, the artificial line that some self-important and calloused demagogues in black robes articulated and expected the Creator of babies to accept? That line?
When you're sitting in the fires of hell, Ruth, make sure you're very loud when you articulate that line again.
To: bedolido
From Mr. Whelan's summary:
It [the Act] provides doctors of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited,
Who wants a doctor of below-ordinary intelligence?
9
posted on
04/18/2007 9:42:34 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("There is no such thing as death for a Christian who believes in the Resurrection." ~ Fr. Ho Lung)
To: Tax-chick
One piece at a time - an this will stop. But this is the lefts sacrament.
10
posted on
04/18/2007 9:44:40 AM PDT
by
reefdiver
(The sheriff of Nottingham collected taxes on behalf of the common good)
To: reefdiver
11
posted on
04/18/2007 9:51:36 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("There is no such thing as death for a Christian who believes in the Resurrection." ~ Fr. Ho Lung)
To: epluribus_2
Funny that the CJ did not recuse himself, being catholic and all, he really did not have a choice in the matter. Can we exclude the liberal justices if they have ever had an abortion (Ginsburg) or paid for an abortion (Souter, Stevens, Breyer)? Do tobacco using Justices recuse themselves in cigarette cases? Do real-estate owning justices recuse themselves in property disputes?
To: LS
Rush going over this now. Since the Chief Justice selects the justice to write the opinion, why did he select Kennedy? I am guess that Kennedy would only sign on if he got to write it and make it as narrow of a ruling as possible.
To: reefdiver
Nearly all abortions are blood sacrifices to the pagan god, Molek—just like in ancient times.
To: bedolido
No one mentions that you have to arrange” a “breach birth” then go to a partial birth” abortion. It would be against medical “ethics” to carry the arranged breach birth to a full delivery. This is why they must pierce the scull before it comes out. Right? So much for ethics.
15
posted on
04/18/2007 10:05:09 AM PDT
by
Waco
To: epluribus_2
Um, all five of the justices who voted the right way are Catholic.
16
posted on
04/18/2007 10:31:12 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: reefdiver; Tax-chick
Indeed it is. And there are already some here on FR saying that this decision just handed the White House to Hillary, and that the GOP needs to run a pro choice candidate.
Interesting times.
17
posted on
04/18/2007 10:31:26 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Always Right
Except as Justice Clarence Thomas EMPHATICALLY told us, there is ZERO discussion before hand of votes, opinions, or even who writes them. The CJ listens to all votes, then assigns someone. Thomas told us that the whole process rarely takes more than 15 minutes.
18
posted on
04/18/2007 10:32:19 AM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: redgolum
some here on FR saying that this decision just handed the White House to Hillary, and that the GOP needs to run a pro choice candidateI'd call that insane.
19
posted on
04/18/2007 11:06:27 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("There is no such thing as death for a Christian who believes in the Resurrection." ~ Fr. Ho Lung)
To: Tax-chick
20
posted on
04/18/2007 11:07:55 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson