Posted on 04/18/2007 7:14:49 AM PDT by Spiff
Edited on 04/18/2007 8:48:59 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court upheld the nationwide ban on a controversial abortion procedure Wednesday, handing abortion opponents the long-awaited victory they expected from a more conservative bench.
The 5-4 ruling said the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a woman's constitutional right to an abortion.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I do not like his stance on immigration either, but he has always been upfront about his stance even before the 2000 election and has never wavered. I respect that.
From DU: “So will women now have to die when there is a deceased fetus in their wombs? Since there is no such medical procedure as a partial birth abortion, and only Intact dilation and extraction which is often used to remove a dead fetus from the womb, how’s that going to happen? Guess the conservative packing of the Supreme Court is working.”
This is one of the most ignorant things I have ever seen posted from them. I had my baby girl die at 30 weeks five years ago. She was vaginal delivered after 24 hours of proper care in the hospital. A stillborn baby is delivered just like any other live baby - this PBA procedure is NOT the usual way of usage on a stillborn - Its major usage is for killing babies!
Praise God from whom all blessings flow!
“To ALL GW Bashers - How do you feel now? This only happened because of GW! Thank God for this great man and great president. We are lucky to have him. For those of you that have abandoned him, bash him on FR and stab him in the back, shame on you! GW, a great president that deserves more respect from conservatives and republicans.”
-
AMEN!
THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH for courageously walking your pro-life talk! . . . and please know that we are praying for you as you continue to uphold the moral/untilitarian efficacy of ADULT vs embryonic stem cell research!
I wonder what Tiller and Carhartt are going to do for a living now?
GWB will always be special to me, no matter how many people try to destroy him. I will admit he made some mistakes but what President hasn’t? He hasn’t been given his due during his time as President but people will look backone day and appreciate him.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Wow! I saw this in Breaking News and didn’t even bother to check my pings - this is THE best news of the year. I’m crying at my desk, I’m so happy.
Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto, sicut erat in principio et nunc et semper et in saecula saeculorum. Amen.
Pope John Paul often spoke of the culture of death, given what we witnessed via Schiavo, VT, and with radicalized Islam, perhaps with this ruling, the tide will turn back, ever so slowly. Could this be a turning point back towards grace?
Abortion opponents say the law will not reduce the number of abortions performed because an alternate method dismembering the fetus BABY in the uterus is available and, indeed, much more common.
Clarified.
“Ginsburg said the latest decision “tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.””
And in saying this she again reveals herself to be a moron who never should have been appointed.
There IS NO medical condition that necessitates this barbaric action and the doctors she cites never said there was.
What should've been done by opponents of Roe was to get another state to pass a PBA ban, slightly modified from the Stenberg ban, and to thereby give the Court a case with which to effectively reverse Stenberg.
YES!!!
“Bush appointees. So how are they for a legacy?”
This is exactly why I won’t be voting for Rudy.
Just how will that Dr. Tiller who does all the PBA make a living?
I am not arguing that it does unless you consider that my use of it to justify denying one type of abortion thereby legitimizes other types. No, it only says this method under review can be legislatively denied.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.