Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe

I’m not sure where the story came that he had his face “blown off”. I can’t find that in the official press conference information. So maybe it was an exaggeration.

People were looking for a reason they didn’t identify the suspect, and it could be they didn’t WANT to leak his identity because they wanted to question other people he might have worked with.

They may have only released his identity today because the gun shop owner leaked it last night to the internet and it was gaining wide circulation.


4,772 posted on 04/17/2007 10:29:21 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4646 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
They may have only released his identity today because the gun shop owner leaked it last night to the internet and it was gaining wide circulation.

The gun shop guy just wrote about a "Mr. Cho." I don't think his actual identity was online anywhere before they released it.

4,776 posted on 04/17/2007 10:33:23 AM PDT by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4772 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
could be they didn’t WANT to leak his identity

You're darn tootin'

Having a bunch of media types start running down friends, witnesses, and gun shops wouldn't have been particularly helpful to the investigation.

Many of our fellow posters seem to have come to the conclusion that, because they hadn't heard a piece of information, the cops also didn't know it. On a closed crime scene, the media finds out what the cops want them to know WHEN the cops want them to know it.

4,793 posted on 04/17/2007 11:16:15 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4772 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson