See, this is why people are getting tired of the “pro-Rudy” crowd.
I come into a thread, and post a comment disagreeing with Land about voting for Hillary instead of Rudy, noting that Hillary is more liberal than Rudy.
And you attack me because, in that comment, I point out the fact that Hillary has more experience than Rudy, suggesting that my saying so means I don’t understand what a liberal Hillary is, even though I SAID she was more liberal than rudy in the very comment you are referencing.
It’s like you went out of your way to mis-characterize my comment just so you could attack me for an ignorance that is in your own mind.
Your words:
.............Hillary does of course have much more experience with the issues that effect this country, having sat in the White house for 8 years and having served in a federal legislature for another 7 years. That gives here a much broader understanding of the concerns of the world than a guy who was nothing more than mayor of a single city.
But experience isn’t everything, and for Land, who certainly is voting morals, the only morals Hillary has over Rudy is that Hillary never got divorced, even when her husband cheated on her. For whatever reason, she did keep her vow to stay married.