Can you do better than that? I don't know, may cite the specific instance? (I don't happen to have Mr. Linsay's telephone number off hand) I should warn you that I think your elephant anecdote is almost certainly bogus.
I am still waiting for the citation showing the basis for Hal Linsay's claim. I asked for it some days ago, but have had no reply.
I tend to distrust creationists' claims regarding science as I have found many such claims, in the few fields with which I am familiar, to be misrepresentations, wishful thinking, or gross exaggerations. Many of the claims I have examined in these fields have turned out to be simply bogus--an attempt to make science match scripture.
Well you must look for them ost obscure off the wall ones to ‘investigate’ and determine the whole field of creation science must therefore be littered with bogus science because most of what I’ve read has proposed facts that get met with ‘counterpoints’ constructed of assumptions and generalizations- you know, suppositions that make the science fit their scriptures (of darwinism)