Well you must look for them ost obscure off the wall ones to ‘investigate’ and determine the whole field of creation science must therefore be littered with bogus science because most of what I’ve read has proposed facts that get met with ‘counterpoints’ constructed of assumptions and generalizations- you know, suppositions that make the science fit their scriptures (of darwinism)
Your post makes no sense. Please try to use better grammar, spelling, and composition. I am not looking to engage in a scavenger hunt to figure out what you are trying to say.
If you can't do better than that, don't bother to post to me.