[Robert A Cook PE]

I notice that the “usual” suspects have voted their RULE (or their political viewpoint) again, regardless of what the US constitution or US laws require.

Now, a question: If the SC inJustices vote their politics (international socialism for example), rather than the law, but the USSC has declared itself the “Holy Grail” of the US, how do you change it?

Asked a different way, have Clinton’s appointees EVER voted AGAINST more government, more socialism, more dominance of the liberal society over American values? Has either EVER voted according to the “law” rather than liberal political views?

[Congressman Billybob]

There are only two ways to control judges who do not obey the law. One is to elect Presidents who will not appoint judges like that. The other is for Congress to control and narrow the jurisdiction of the federal courts, as the Constitution allows.

This is not either/or. This is both/and. Lastly, Clinton judges are not always and in all cases antithetical to the Constitution. Only sometimes do they savage the Constitution. But the water drop of sometimes, will inevitably destroy the Constitution.

John / Billybob