Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mobile Vulgus; SierraWasp; AuntB; calcowgirl
Typical liberal _itch... symbolism before substance. First research study for the bimbo I found after googling 'Charity comparisons liberal vs conservative".

In the November 23 issue of "The Chronicle of Philanthropy," Syracuse University economist Arthur C. Brooks confirmed my hunch. For all their ranting about mean-spirited, greedy religious conservatives not caring about anyone save themselves, it appears liberal, secular Democrats are more accurately describing themselves.

Brooks details how religious Democrats and Republicans annually give three and half times more to charities than our secular brethren. In dollars that averages $2,210 to $642.

Eventually, though, Brooks found that "households headed by conservatives contributed 30 percent more to charity" than liberal-led families.

"In the end," he said, "I had no option but to change my views."


A lib has their first intelligent thought, when they pay attention to a conservative, and actually get it. The smart ones then begin a slide to the right, albeit...there's soooo many stupid ones out there!
17 posted on 04/13/2007 6:46:10 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Duncan Hunter for president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Issaquahking

It’s like the nonsense we hear that Mexico wouldn’t be in a mess if we would just send them money!!

Take a look at the Mexican aid we send every year, millions upon millions, and does it do ANY good? NO!

http://mexico.usembassy.gov/mexico/aid.html


25 posted on 04/13/2007 8:02:03 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson