Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I think I'm gonna be sick...
1 posted on 04/12/2007 8:20:57 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

2 posted on 04/12/2007 8:21:25 PM PDT by nutmeg (The Democrats' "new direction" for Iraq: SURRENDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Great issue for 2008 anyway - one we can’t possibly lose.


3 posted on 04/12/2007 8:23:20 PM PDT by SteveMcKing ("Context" -- the best friend of Hypocrisy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
I am too nutmeg!!

“Rep. Michael Lawlor, D-East Haven, the judiciary committee’s co-chairman, said public opinion about gay marriage is swiftly evolving. “People are obviously changing their minds,” he said, noting that just this week a California legislative committee approved a similar gay marriage measure.”

OK, Mike? First off, ewwwwwww, and then, NO public opinion is NOT evolving. The only thing evolving is the ways legislatures like yours gag the honest opinions. And my guess is you all know it. And furthermore, what the CA legislature is doing is ignoring the vote of the people, and THAT is unconstitutional.

Typical, give them civil unions, they still whine, until they get marriage. Once you grant them that, AGAINST the will of the voters, they will want more. Don’t ever doubt it.

4 posted on 04/12/2007 9:00:34 PM PDT by gidget7 (2Th 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Right. It’s so popular the only way to get it passed is for wacko legislatures to bypass the people and mandate it.


6 posted on 04/13/2007 12:27:35 AM PDT by Politicalmom (I'm confused. The GOP doesn't need social conservatives, but socons made them lose in 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
I think that I have my wife convinced that if this passes, it is time to leave Connecticut.

Being that she’s a life-time resident here, she’s been reluctant to move out of state.

7 posted on 04/13/2007 4:48:33 AM PDT by CT-Freeper (Said the perpetually dejected Mets fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg
While she said she is pleased to have some rights, she is continually reminded that her relationship is not accorded the same status as a marriage.

Uh, that's because you don't have a husband....

12 posted on 04/13/2007 8:43:02 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Giuliani: A strict constructionist judge can come to either conclusion about Roe against Wade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Barf! The legislatures don’t seem to care what the people in the state want, only a handful of liberals and homosexual activists. They don’t care about morality in making laws. The will continue to push this until homosexuals have their marriage. When will it stop? Polygamists, zoophiles?


14 posted on 04/13/2007 9:30:26 AM PDT by Pinkbell (Whack-A-Lib = Improved version of Whack-A-Mole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

Like half of the commitee is openly gay in the first place. No surprise. Thank goodness it will die on the floor...for now. Buys us sometime before the next assault on marriage.


22 posted on 04/16/2007 7:03:29 PM PDT by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson