Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUKE CASE: WILL THE TIMES APOLOGIZE?
New York Post ^ | 4/12/7 | Andrea Peyser

Posted on 04/12/2007 9:00:27 AM PDT by SmithL

REVERSE the races, change the sport, and you have the Kobe Bryant "rape" hoax all over again.

It frightens me that, in this day and age, three demonstrably innocent men can be dragged into the public square in chains and be unjustly accused, tried and convicted in the media - forcibly lynched - for a rape that never happened.

There are many victims in the case of the guiltless Duke lacrosse players. And many more perpetrators who, through wishful thinking, greed, arrogance or lunacy, kept this case going long after the accused boys should have received a heartfelt apology.

But the biggest losers may be the ones you'll never hear about. These are the genuine victims of sexual assault: women who don't fabricate tales of brutality, or seek out the richest, whitest men to falsely accuse of forcing them into sex.

Who will believe a rape victim now?

Lakers guard Bryant was wrongly accused of raping a disappointed and willing sex partner; the Duke boys were victimized by a stripper who, for reasons that exist mainly in her head, decided that crying "Rape!" was easier than getting a day job.

But the Duke case goes far beyond the Bryant debacle. It features a "rogue prosecutor" - as ex-Durham DA Mike Nifong was called yesterday - who visibily salivated at the notion of taking down the boys.

Truth be damned.

It also benefited from a lynch culture at Duke, where 88 professors signed an ad vowing to "turn up the volume" against the falsely accused men.

Due process be damned.

Worst of all, this story so neatly fit the radical agenda of our "newspaper of record," The New York Times, that the paper disgustingly advanced the hoax on its front page, long after other media outlets had backed off.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; lax; nyslimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: randog

That...would be beautiful.


21 posted on 04/12/2007 11:32:58 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I’ll repeat myself... I dislike lawyers intensely, having been a key player in a civil suit once, but in this case I hope that the three lacrosse player go after every single person, organization, and group that defamed, slandered, or libeled them. Do not be nice. Get those bigoted Duke professors on the stand to testify about their hatred of certain races and nationalities. Pillory the accuser. Sue the crap out of the Times, CNN, and anyone else who put the players in a “false light.” Especially go after anyone who hung up a poster on Duke accusing them of rape before the facts. Get sue happy. Make these guys rich. Make their lawsuits a warning for anyone who thinks it is OK to go after someone with a false accusation.

Yep, I’m a little ticked off about this.


22 posted on 04/12/2007 12:47:27 PM PDT by redpoll (redpoll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Its not KBryant all over again ..that was completely differant situation, where the media and the masses including the numchucks demonsrating in favor of Bryant and his activities on the court house lawn were overwhelmingly for Bryant....

he admitted to something happening....there was her blood on his shirt...and he ended up making a public apology and settled a nice civil suit.....

unproved criminal allegations do not equal false allegations...

not every crime is reported or charges sent up....nor do juries convict people even though they are obviously guilty (Simpson and Blake come to mind).

in the Duke case, there simply was NO evidence ...none....in the Bryant case, there was evidence...but not strong enough to bring to trial...( but strong enough to allow public acknowledgements and a civil suit).

its happening...the Duke crap makes every rape allegation a lie apparently.....

every case is differant and every case has to be considered on its own merits....

23 posted on 04/12/2007 1:23:32 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redpoll

I hope that the three lacrosse player go after every single person, organization, and group that defamed, slandered, or libeled them. Do not be nice.
-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—<>-—

Agreed!


24 posted on 04/12/2007 5:37:19 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Andrea Peyser is a horse’s ass. I find it difficult to agree with her even when I agree with her.


25 posted on 04/12/2007 7:05:34 PM PDT by sig226 (Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass

The attorney general said they won’t prosecute her because they think she believes all the various stories she told. There are only a couple of ways her behavior could be excused in this fashion. One is that she is genuinely mentally ill. Another is that the prosecutors noticed that she was repeatedly drunk when she was interviewed and they don’t want to embarrass themselves further.


26 posted on 04/12/2007 7:09:05 PM PDT by sig226 (Where did my tag line go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Hey apologize thats the “A” word! Besides is their anyone working at the Times anymore? An irrelevant rag of a newspaper full of lies and liberal propaganda!
27 posted on 04/12/2007 7:09:40 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (ID RATHER BE HUNTING WITH DICK THAN DRIVING WITH TED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

LoL — that was like, excellent, or something


28 posted on 04/12/2007 7:15:14 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

uuuhh, like thanks...or something.


29 posted on 04/12/2007 8:57:46 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson