My only question is why this thread seems to be bringing out so many of the "strange" types. Frankly, none of your posts made a nickel's worth of sense. A couple of you here on this thread are either just trying to learn logic, and I'm the guinea pig, or you're just trying to disrupt a reasonable discussion of something that's over your head. I'm not sure which, but either way you offer nothing of substance to the discussion. But don't feel bad. As I said, you're not the only one.
I've conluded that you're rather pathetic with your decision to commence with your name calling, slurs, insinuations and inuendo.
I would think anyone with a brain who has been around here understands that when someone is mentioned by screen name, common courtesy requires a ping.
You, of course, avoid this by making unspecific statements about others as evidenced below...
My only question is why this thread seems to be bringing out so many of the "strange" types.
Which, after all, isn't really a question at all.
I tend to think that those who are so wrapped up in their own little philosophies such that they cannot debate, but must resort to personal insults (like you are doing [and please try to find something somewhere before this reply where I've insulted you]) so as to keep their philosophical house of cards together are themselves in little gulags.
In summation I can only conclude that you lost the "argument" (to use your own word) so you have no recourse but to devolve down.
Have fun in your little gulag. And keep in mind, you set the criteria, not I.