I've conluded that you're rather pathetic with your decision to commence with your name calling, slurs, insinuations and inuendo.
I would think anyone with a brain who has been around here understands that when someone is mentioned by screen name, common courtesy requires a ping.
You, of course, avoid this by making unspecific statements about others as evidenced below...
My only question is why this thread seems to be bringing out so many of the "strange" types.
Which, after all, isn't really a question at all.
I tend to think that those who are so wrapped up in their own little philosophies such that they cannot debate, but must resort to personal insults (like you are doing [and please try to find something somewhere before this reply where I've insulted you]) so as to keep their philosophical house of cards together are themselves in little gulags.
In summation I can only conclude that you lost the "argument" (to use your own word) so you have no recourse but to devolve down.
Have fun in your little gulag. And keep in mind, you set the criteria, not I.
Spell check is our friend. Actually, I believe you are referring to your "Freeper" friends. I have never posted an insult except in return for one given. So you apparently haven't looked at many posts here.
You, of course, avoid this by making unspecific statements about others as evidenced below... My only question is why this thread seems to be bringing out so many of the "strange" types. Which, after all, isn't really a question at all.
It's amazing you picked up on that so quickly. Kinda like "dragging a $10 bill though a trailer court". The intended surface quickly, knowing they fit the description.
In summation I can only conclude that you lost the "argument" (to use your own word) so you have no recourse but to devolve down.
Devolving down would be the only way of communicating with you and a few other screwballs here. I don't think I've communicated, so I can only surmise I haven't devolved far enough down.
You take care.