BUMP!
A pathetic comment on our MSM. . .and knowing Repubs as well; who keep the silence.
They lived and ruled. . .like Dictators in the White House; and having never changed their MO; we can only look forward to worse, as time goes by. . .
All forget, it is a Clinton involved, that makes it alright.
ping
I asked admin mod to correct spelling error in headline
The whole story is here -— http://hillcap.org/
Have you forgotten that the rules that apply to the rest of us do not apply to the Clintons?
To his credit, he did return some of it to Red China when he got caught. But the whole exercise was enough to exempt the Clintons from any such laws.
Besides, Democrats get money only from wealthy socialists and foreign anti-Americans. The Democrat constituency takes, they do not give.
Good luck. The Clinton administration took money from foreign nationals, and it became public, and they got away with it. There is no reason to think it will be held against them ever again.
I can’t get the link to the music to work, Doug. I’m getting a bad link response from esnips. Here it is:
Broken Link
The link you clicked on is not complete.
If you clicked a link within an e-mail message, please verify that the link was not broken in the middle.
If it is broken, copy and paste the entire link into your browser.
Sorry for the broken link. Where else can the song be hosted?
The link you clicked on is not complete. If you clicked a link within an e-mail message, please verify that the link was not broken in the middle. If it is broken, copy and paste the entire link into your browser.
You will be redirected to the eSnips home in a few seconds...
Amazing! What could be more un-American than taking foreign money to run for office? There is no such thing as being lower than a Clinton.
HOW THE CLINTONS COLLAPSED STAN LEE MEDIA — http://youtube.com/watch?v=LUWlxc7h5AI
All The Ex-President’s Money
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/thomas022607.php3
Excerpts:
Former President Bill Clinton is one of a kind, but we knew that already. No president before him has managed to cash in from his time in office with such shameless abandon. A Washington Post story by John Solomon and Matthew Mosk is staggering in its revelations of Clinton's greed. In the six years since he left the presidency, Clinton has taken in nearly $40 million — between nine and 10 million of it last year. Clinton averaged "almost a speech a day" in 2006. Twenty percent of his fees reportedly "were for personal income." The rest of his speeches, says the Post, were for no fee or for donations to Clinton's foundation.
The Clintons are plowing new ground. Ethics and election laws should keep pace. Never before has the spouse of a former president run for president. One of the reasons for disclosure forms is to ensure no improper influences are exerted on public officials by outside groups, or governments. Among those for whom Clinton spoke were a Saudi Arabia investment firm ($600,000 for two speeches), a Chinese real estate firm, run by a Communist Party official ($200,000), and a Toronto company, founded by a Kenyan immigrant who was convicted of stock fraud and barred for life from the brokerage business ($650,000 in 2005 and an undisclosed sum last year). The public needs to know more about their backgrounds.
While other ex-presidents have spoken for money, there has been nothing on this scale and none of their spouses served as elected officials.
If the new Democratic congressional leadership is serious about living up to its pledge of a far more ethical body than the one run by Republicans, the Senate Ethics Committee will get on this right away. There ought to be an investigation into the associations and ties of especially foreign governments and interests who paid these big bucks to Bill Clinton.