Skip to comments.
Schumer calls for subprime bailout
CNN Money & Yahoo ^
| April 11, 2007
Posted on 04/11/2007 1:55:10 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
Edited on 04/11/2007 2:03:12 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
The federal government should offer troubled borrowers hundreds of millions of dollars to bail them out of subprime mortgage loans, several leading Democratic lawmakers said on Wednesday.
"The federal government can send in an infusion of [money] to prevent foreclosure," said Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat.
(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: housingbubble; realestate; schmuckie; schumer; subprime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
You knew this was coming
To: stainlessbanner
2
posted on
04/11/2007 1:57:04 PM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: stainlessbanner
Could the governmental “teet” get any bigger for these people to suck at?
3
posted on
04/11/2007 1:57:30 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(I buy gas for my Hummer with the Carbon Offsets I sell on Ebay!)
To: stainlessbanner
Those idiots willingly signed up for these flim-flim mortgages and many bought houses well beyond their means which led to rising real estate prices for the folks who didn’t take one of these mortgages. Why should we have to subsidize stupidity?
To: stainlessbanner
staged events will abound, stainless, now America has decided Jesus is out of style...
5
posted on
04/11/2007 1:58:37 PM PDT
by
100-Fold_Return
(Starting' to catch on the conspiracy is no "theory??")
To: stainlessbanner
Chuckie has effective killed any future he had in banking.
To: stainlessbanner
I bet anyone a weeks pay Chuckie has investments and or friends in the business.
7
posted on
04/11/2007 1:58:56 PM PDT
by
hophead
("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: stainlessbanner
Do you suppose there’s a reason that subprime loans are called subprime and junk bonds are called junk?
8
posted on
04/11/2007 1:59:10 PM PDT
by
omega4412
(Multiculturalism kills. 9/11, Beslan, Madrid, London, Salt Lake City)
To: stainlessbanner
In other news, the sun rose in the east. Yep, we knew it was coming, and it better not be allowed to succeed.
9
posted on
04/11/2007 2:00:08 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: stainlessbanner
Wonderful. Not only are we paying our own mortgages, now we are expected to pay the mortgages of people who never should have gotten a mortgage in the first place.
To: SmoothTalker
“Those idiots willingly signed up for these flim-flim mortgages...”
Greed played a BIG part in those loans on BOTH sides. The people who took those loans were hoping for a big profit in a short time hoping the value of their house would continue to rise like they have in the past few years. Guess what. They lost that bet and now are crying about it.
11
posted on
04/11/2007 2:01:35 PM PDT
by
hophead
("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
To: stainlessbanner
Ummm... isn’t this actually a bank bailout? This will save banks from having to repossessing and sell property that has deprepreciated.
12
posted on
04/11/2007 2:01:52 PM PDT
by
Wiseghy
("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
To: hophead
I bet anyone a weeks pay Chuckie has investments and or friends in the businessI'll take that bet. And when I lose the bet, I'll get the gubmint to bail me out.
To: stainlessbanner
To: SmoothTalker
Subsidizing stupidity? Hell, it’s the demoncrat way!!
15
posted on
04/11/2007 2:03:42 PM PDT
by
Vasilli22
(http://www.richardfest.blogspot.com/)
To: Admin Moderator
Apologies - please alter or pull.
I thought it was AP via Yahoo.
To: stainlessbanner
17
posted on
04/11/2007 2:03:46 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
To: stainlessbanner
You know, this sounds like the old Savings and Loan debacle of years ago. Those people invested in those companies because they offered higher interest rates on savings. Higher interest = higher risk. When it crashed down on them, how was that my problem? I don't recall reaping any rewards from their risky behavior. Now Chuckie wants me to do it all over again with a bunch of people who bought more than they can afford. NOT MY PROBLEM, SO DON'T TRY TO MAKE ME PAY FOR IT!
18
posted on
04/11/2007 2:04:01 PM PDT
by
econjack
To: stainlessbanner
Anything I might say about Chuckie would probably violate the CoC here.
19
posted on
04/11/2007 2:04:07 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: stainlessbanner
BOHICA. If worker’s jobs are not protected then don’t protect investor’s money.
20
posted on
04/11/2007 2:04:55 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson