The comments are all 10 or more years old.
Please tell us who you are FOR. It is easy to be against someone. To be for someone requires logical determination of the best out of a field.
Y'all really need to make up your mind. On one hand, Rudy is the model of long-term consistency of views. But when inconvenient quotes by Rudy are dredged up by his opponents, y'all turn on a time and try to discredit them because they are old.
Which one is it?
Please tell us who you are FOR.
Check my tagline.
It is easy to be against someone. To be for someone requires logical determination of the best out of a field.
I've already done that.
I've also determined that Rudy would be an unmitigated disaster for both the GOP if nominated and for the country if elected. So I will counter the Rudy-booster spin machine every chance I get.
I have comments on his liberalism going all the way up through this month.
It establishes a pattern of liberalism - that why the thread is about him being a “lifelong liberal”.
As far as who to be for - once we get the liberals out of contention for the nomination, then we can pick from the best CONSERVATIVE candidate to represent the GOP.