Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: al baby
What a dumbass this writer is! Offing boomers will do squat to solve the problem when were importing third worlders on SSI and totalization agreements with Mexico under terms more favorable than offered to American workers.

A far better way to solve the problem would be incentives for boomers to work until they are 70 (or older). Most boomers got through public schools before they we dumbed down with political correctness and, as a result, can run circles around their modern-day counterparts when it comes to reading, writing and math.

We're constantly told we must import the third world due to our coming labor shortage. We wouldn't if boomers could stay in the workforce longer. And maybe some of the people collecting welfare checks could pick vegetables and clean hotel rooms.

8 posted on 04/10/2007 7:37:57 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
We wouldn't if boomers could stay in the workforce longer.

Then nobody will get promoted as the oldsters continue to hog the top positions causing depressed wages in the prime earning years of Gen X and less opportunity for Gen Y causing the need for even more labor to be imported.

It's not that simple....

Besides, they already upped the retirement age for Gen X.

27 posted on 04/10/2007 8:06:47 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith (There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
"can run circles around their modern-day counterparts when it comes to reading, writing and math.
If the boomer's are so good at math, explain our Nations fiscal picture. There either stupid or apathetic to the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of humankind that will befall their children and grandchildren.

42 posted on 04/10/2007 8:51:33 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
We wouldn’t have a problem with social security if it only paid the people who contributed to it. I don’t know the figures but I bet more than 25% of the people on social security are under the age of 50. I would also be willing to bet that over half of the 25% paid little or nothing into the fund.
52 posted on 04/10/2007 10:43:57 PM PDT by peeps36 (OUTLAWED WORDS--INSURGENT,GLOBAL WARMING,UNDOCUMENTED WORKER,PALESTINIAN,TERMINATED PREGNANCY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilanteman
A far better way to solve the problem would be incentives for boomers to work until they are 70 (or older).

I have *no* problem with that. As things stand now my husband and I can't touch retirement until we're 70, so why should Boomers be allowed to retire before then? Will we be "less old" at 70 than Grandpa is now?

98 posted on 04/11/2007 3:58:35 PM PDT by Marie (Unintended consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson