To: al baby
What a dumbass this writer is! Offing boomers will do squat to solve the problem when were importing third worlders on SSI and totalization agreements with Mexico under terms more favorable than offered to American workers.
A far better way to solve the problem would be incentives for boomers to work until they are 70 (or older). Most boomers got through public schools before they we dumbed down with political correctness and, as a result, can run circles around their modern-day counterparts when it comes to reading, writing and math.
We're constantly told we must import the third world due to our coming labor shortage. We wouldn't if boomers could stay in the workforce longer. And maybe some of the people collecting welfare checks could pick vegetables and clean hotel rooms.
8 posted on
04/10/2007 7:37:57 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Vigilanteman
We wouldn't if boomers could stay in the workforce longer. Then nobody will get promoted as the oldsters continue to hog the top positions causing depressed wages in the prime earning years of Gen X and less opportunity for Gen Y causing the need for even more labor to be imported.
It's not that simple....
Besides, they already upped the retirement age for Gen X.
27 posted on
04/10/2007 8:06:47 PM PDT by
Cogadh na Sith
(There's an open road from the cradle to the tomb.)
To: Vigilanteman
"can run circles around their modern-day counterparts when it comes to reading, writing and math.
If the boomer's are so good at math, explain our Nations fiscal picture. There either stupid or apathetic to the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of humankind that will befall their children and grandchildren.
42 posted on
04/10/2007 8:51:33 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
To: Vigilanteman
We wouldn’t have a problem with social security if it only paid the people who contributed to it. I don’t know the figures but I bet more than 25% of the people on social security are under the age of 50. I would also be willing to bet that over half of the 25% paid little or nothing into the fund.
52 posted on
04/10/2007 10:43:57 PM PDT by
peeps36
(OUTLAWED WORDS--INSURGENT,GLOBAL WARMING,UNDOCUMENTED WORKER,PALESTINIAN,TERMINATED PREGNANCY)
To: Vigilanteman
A far better way to solve the problem would be incentives for boomers to work until they are 70 (or older). I have *no* problem with that. As things stand now my husband and I can't touch retirement until we're 70, so why should Boomers be allowed to retire before then? Will we be "less old" at 70 than Grandpa is now?
98 posted on
04/11/2007 3:58:35 PM PDT by
Marie
(Unintended consequences.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson