Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: romanesq
Raising the issue of the child is superflous as no one would suggest the child is guilty of anything.

It's not superfluous at all. Many of the folks posting here are at least incidentally harming a child, and see it as excusable because of misconduct of the child's mother.

451 posted on 04/11/2007 9:13:08 AM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies ]


To: HitmanLV
t’s not superfluous at all. Many of the folks posting here are at least incidentally harming a child, and see it as excusable because of misconduct of the child’s mother......

I think the proper approach would be to go after the real father...why should the mother protect the true father...the courts should order her to name the sperm donor, and have it confimed with DNA.....that is if she can identified him....

458 posted on 04/11/2007 10:38:35 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: HitmanLV

Sorry I don’t think you can prove that “folks posting here are at least incidentally harming a child” because they don’t support a program where the fatherless pay for other’s children.

Although that seems to be the consensus, you keep arguing to convince others the state should impose the opposite. I think you are speaking to the wrong audience. This is not a socialist website.


478 posted on 04/11/2007 3:16:44 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson