Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OB1kNOb
... What are the guy's best options under these circumstances to protect the baby's life and health while protecting his right to prove he is or is not the father? Anyone have any advice?My advice to you, young Jedi, is to stick to your guns. Resist all temptation to give in to the pressure.

Remember, someone's FUTURE this is that you deal with.

The child's DNA can be sampled from the amniotic fluid, so completely non-invasive it is to the child. The doctor either lying is, or kept up with prenatal medicine for the last 30 years he has not.

Wait for the DNA test, boy. To impulsively sign the birth certificate, well, that may lead to heartbreak, and heartbreak inevitably leads to the Dark Side.

Take my advice yourself, young Jedi, or to your friend pass it along.


363 posted on 04/10/2007 6:43:41 PM PDT by FierceDraka ("I am not a number, I am a free man!" - Prisoner Number Six)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: FierceDraka

“The child’s DNA can be sampled from the amniotic fluid, so completely non-invasive it is to the child.”

Well, kinda. The amnio procedure carries a small (like .2% or something, but 2/1,000 add up in a big country) risk of miscarriage.


366 posted on 04/10/2007 6:58:18 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson