What is pathetic are people like you who think that a man who is duped into believing a child is his should have to keep paying when the truth finally comes out. What about the biological father? Do you think the guy should just walk while someone else shoulders his reponsibilities. What a total fool you are.
I explained my position and argue that this would be true when the father has established a father-child personal relationship with the child. When confronted with options where the child takes the hit, or the adult male, I think the males hould rightfully take the hit.
What about the biological father? Do you think the guy should just walk while someone else shoulders his responsibilities.
I never suggested that - chalk this up to a self serving Freeper imagination (more and more common lately, I wish it were the late 90s again). I think the biodad should contribute to the financial support of the child, also, once established.
What a total fool you are.
Not really.