Replies

What is pathetic are people like you who think that a man who is duped into believing a child is his should have to keep paying when the truth finally comes out.

I explained my position and argue that this would be true when the father has established a father-child personal relationship with the child. When confronted with options where the child takes the hit, or the adult male, I think the males hould rightfully take the hit.

What about the biological father? Do you think the guy should just walk while someone else shoulders his responsibilities.

I never suggested that - chalk this up to a self serving Freeper imagination (more and more common lately, I wish it were the late 90s again). I think the biodad should contribute to the financial support of the child, also, once established.

What a total fool you are.

Not really.

I don’t give a rat’s behind what relationship the guy establishes with the child. He was duped or he wouldn’t have established the relationship. The real father should be the on e paying the freight. And, yes, you are a fool and a socialist to boot.

"When confronted with options where the child takes the hit, or the adult male, I think the males hould rightfully take the hit."

Well, there's your problem.

You left 'adult female' out of the equation.

Obviously, that's where any 'hit' should be taken.