Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burr opposes site for Navy field
Raleigh News & Observer ^ | Apr 10, 2007 | By Wade Rawlins, Staff Writer

Posted on 04/10/2007 10:11:23 AM PDT by nctexan

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr came out Monday against the Navy's plan to build a jet runway near a national wildlife refuge in Eastern North Carolina, calling the plan "an untenable proposition."

In making the stand, Burr joined growing bipartisan opposition to the Navy's plan for a practice airstrip in Washington and Beaufort counties, putting the project's future in doubt.

Burr's letter follows recent statements by Democratic Gov. Mike Easley decrying the Navy's choice of sites and demanding that Congress withhold $10 million for the project. U.S. Reps. Walter Jones and Robin Hayes, both Republicans, wrote letters of opposition, joining several Democratic congressman.

And last week, fellow U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Dole sent a letter questioning the Navy about its choice of sites. She expressed concern, but did not say whether she was for or against it.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burr; environmental; navair; nc; vieques
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
This is disappointing from our Republican NC Senator.

The power of the environment lobby trumps adequate training for our troops and airmen.

Burr's argument about safety of pilots does not ring strong for Navy / Marines who train in the bird rich coastal areas by necessity.

1 posted on 04/10/2007 10:11:25 AM PDT by nctexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nctexan

Have you ever been in this area and seen the profuse number of birds? From a safety standpoint it makes no sense to build a jet runway in the middle of a wildlife refuge and bird migratory route.


2 posted on 04/10/2007 10:16:57 AM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (A day in the country is better than a week in town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

“Have you ever been in this area and seen the profuse number of birds? From a safety standpoint it makes no sense to build a jet runway in the middle of a wildlife refuge and bird migratory route.”

I would tend to agree with this. Let Virginia have the site. Or put it somewhere else in NC.


3 posted on 04/10/2007 10:18:05 AM PDT by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

Alaska has lots of open land and I am sure we would welcome all the advantage$ of a Navy facility.


4 posted on 04/10/2007 10:19:31 AM PDT by ASOC (Yeah, well, maybe - but can you *prove* it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

I have; it’s entirely too beautiful to put a field there.

It was a ridiculous choice; they had to know this was coming.


5 posted on 04/10/2007 10:21:06 AM PDT by Howlin (Honk if you like Fred Thompson!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; Bean Counter; investigateworld; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
This is a medium volume pinglist.

6 posted on 04/10/2007 10:23:31 AM PDT by magslinger (Submission? That's a bit of a problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nctexan
Al-Qaeda continues to take over more and more of the US Senate.

Repeal the 17th Amendment so we can get some real Americans in the US senate.

7 posted on 04/10/2007 10:28:49 AM PDT by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker; Rb ver. 2.0; Clemenza; COEXERJ145; RayChuang88; phantomworker
“Have you ever been in this area and seen the profuse number of birds? From a safety standpoint it makes no sense to build a jet runway in the middle of a wildlife refuge and bird migratory route.”

About 15-20 years ago there was talk about building a third commercial airport for the west Houston region near Katy, Texas. There are lots of rice farms in the area, and in fact quite a bit of land currently used for rice farming would have had to be condemned to build the airport. The proposal was killed off by a combination of farm owners and envirionmentalists, because of its effects on habitat for migratory birds. Of course it's not such a great idea to put an airport right in the middle of migratory bird habitats.

8 posted on 04/10/2007 10:29:06 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nctexan; TaxRelief; Alia; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; A2J; a4drvr; Adder; ...

NC *Ping*

Please FRmail Constitution Day if you want to be added to or removed from this North Carolina ping list.
9 posted on 04/10/2007 10:29:56 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
"...put it somewhere else in NC."

I have previously offered the perfect solution. Put a mothballed aircraft carrier on the beach in front of John Edwards' beach home.

10 posted on 04/10/2007 10:37:07 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The proposal was killed off by a combination of farm owners

Some of the rice farmers were in favor of it. You can make more with commercial development than you can growing rice.

11 posted on 04/10/2007 10:45:29 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
You can make more with commercial development than you can growing rice.

I tried telling this to the country folk in Taiwan (I suggested a golf resort) but they're happy continuing as they've done for who knows how long, growing and raising all the food their village needs and don't want it to change.

And when put that way, why should they change?

12 posted on 04/10/2007 10:53:02 AM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nctexan
A little background for those who are new to this situation.

Due to population encroachment at both NAS Oceana and NALF Fentress the Navy is looking for a sight at which to conduct Field Carrier Landing Practice. Based on currency the Navy has a certain number of practice touch and go's that each pilot must complete prior to going to the ship for carrier qualification. A certain segment of the population around Va. Beach is constantly complaining because they built their houses around a fighter base, and low and behold there is jet noise.

Desirable requirements would be, a remote location, room for an 8,000 ft airstrip, ability to avoid high air traffic areas, within a short distance of Oceana.

Obviously the bird thing is an issue, but I don't think it's the real driving issue. I think more of an issue is the noise of aircraft operating around the clock with little economic benefit to the community. I totally agree with this complaint. Why should Va Beach continue to have the financial benefit of basing aircraft where they can't fly.

In general Oceana sucks as an airbase. It has poor range space, a limited bombing range, noise abatement issues, and the weather isn't all that great, either. Time to close it down and move somewhere else.

13 posted on 04/10/2007 10:56:29 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nctexan

So let me get this straight. It’s ok for the Kennedy Space Center to abut a wildlife refuge, but not an F/A-18 practice facility.

Where has common-sense gone?


14 posted on 04/10/2007 10:56:31 AM PDT by -gjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

The rice farms around Houston were huge commercial operations - some were 10-15,000 acres.


15 posted on 04/10/2007 11:00:30 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nctexan
It is unusual for a US Senator to NOT want the Fed to spend money in his/her home state.

Back in the 1970's the Navy wanted to install Project Sanguin over 22,500 square miles of Michigan's Upper Peninsula and Northern Wisconsin's forests. To install it, they were going to carve 300 foot wide criss crossed swaths to lay cable every mile. The residents of Michigan and Wisconsin fought back until the Navy downsized the project and renamed it Seafarer. The residents still fought it. Finally the Navy settled for a single cable from the Wisconsin transmitter to the Michigan transmitter known as ELF. When the Navy makes up it's mind it wants something, it is very hard to make them go away.

16 posted on 04/10/2007 11:05:27 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: -gjd
I can't argue the bird flight path situation of this specific location.

However, I have flown out of Cherry Point, New River Air Station and NAS Oceana and I know that coastal birds are a part of USMC/NAVAL aviation.

I trust our Naval planners more than NC Governor (W)Easley or the Green "experts".

17 posted on 04/10/2007 11:17:36 AM PDT by nctexan (Top 10 Presidential Reqs. for 2008 - see my homepage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
It is unusual for a US Senator to NOT want the Fed to spend money in his/her home state.

True, that. However, in this case, in addition to the migratory bird problem (which is a valid concern), there would have been no offsetting economic benefit for North Carolina other than short-term employment during construction of the facility. No personnel would be based at the landing field; it was strictly to be a "touch-and-go" runway. The pilots and support staff would be based elsewhere. So, all of the noise and other hazards, and none of the benefits.

What's a bit surprising is the length of time it took Burr to come out against this plan. It has long been extremely unpopular in northeastern NC among people of all political persuasions. The Navy referred to it as an Outlying Landing Field, or OLF for short. Thousands, and I mean thousands of "No OLF" signs may be seen in the area; those not familiar with the acronym might have assumed there was some Scandanavian guy the locals didn't care for.

18 posted on 04/10/2007 11:20:45 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nctexan

Not quite the same, but Fort Sill, Oklahoma’s field artillery firing range adjoins the large Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, and has since the 1930’s.

The continuous artillery firing in WWII caused us to have to sometimes look outside to see if a thunderstorm was in our midst.

It didn’t seem to bother the Texas Longhorn herds, the buffalo herds (or as my daughter would tell me, “Daddy, that’s bison”), or a lot of other game you can find in the refuge.

Birds may be a different matter. But Fort Sill and the Wildlife Refuge have coexisted for a lot of years without seeming conflict.


19 posted on 04/10/2007 11:36:42 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

Since Burr has come out of the closet as a McCain backer, I will be voting for anyone who runs against him in his next run.


20 posted on 04/10/2007 11:37:20 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson