I am merely pointing out that which I have consistently decried since I started posting here, and that is the use of unnamed sources. People familiar with me know I distrust them, because with no way to verify a fact or quote from such an unnamed source, a reporter could actually make things up (which I am certain the New York Times does as a matter of company policy).
My standard is the same for ALL stories and ALL media. I don't give anyone a pass on this because it has contributed so much to the poor state of journalism that we suffer with today.
well if you had been stiffed by Giuliani for 2800 bucks, would you allow your name to be publicised? Remember, Kessler cited 2 participants. Also there is the little matter of Giulianis staff/campaign NOT denying it......I’m skeptical of Newsmax occassionally, too, but face it, they’re not WND or Debka.
See posts #55 and #56.