Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clean Cars: Proposed State Law Would Impose Fee On Gas-Guzzlers, Hand Cash To Gas-Sippers
San Jose Mercury News ^ | 4/9/07 | Paul Rogers

Posted on 04/09/2007 7:37:43 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: TMD; river rat

Anybody want to take a guess at the pollution-per-person-mile of those under-utilised bus and train systems ?

It can’t compare favorably to a Hummer.

Rather than expensive ($200,000 each) city buses that get poor mileage (5mpg in city) and require drivers, I’d like to see automated 2-passenger cabs. That would be a ‘mass-transit system’ I could support. I’ll bet it would be cheaper to operate and safer due to its door-to-door nature.


61 posted on 04/09/2007 3:44:05 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Don’t you just love the sweet smell of socialism and Marxism in the morning air????


62 posted on 04/09/2007 3:48:21 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Just at what point did you think I actually gave care about your opinion?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Oh, come now, play along !

People weren’t supposed to catch onto that aspect until after the law was in place.

Now you’ve spoiled the surprise.


63 posted on 04/09/2007 3:50:40 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CCGuy

Exactly!

Imagine that. Liberals using something else to take money away from some people in order to give it to others.

Sometimes I really hate be in CA.”

Move.

Lincoln abolished slavery- you can go elsewhere!!!


64 posted on 04/09/2007 3:59:12 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: river rat
Grim, huh?

Grim.

Gary Owen

65 posted on 04/09/2007 6:51:06 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom; All

The taxpayer already pays - the cost associated with the tax credit paid on each biofuel/ethanol vehicle sold. This is paid each year over the life of the vehicle. http://www.globalsubsidies.org/IMG/pdf/biofuels_subsidies_us.pdf


66 posted on 04/09/2007 8:23:29 PM PDT by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz

—If they are going to do this they need to open the door for diesels to be sold in California—

Which is *exactly* what is happening between now and 2008.

Virtually every car maker is rolling out 50-state-legal diesel cars and trucks.

Given the new (as of October 2006) diesel fuel which contains almost no sulfur, they are able to make Diesel engines quiet, not smelly, and use new filter technologies which are squeaky clean on emmisions.
(NOTE: With NO performance reductions)

http://world.honda.com/news/2006/c060925DieselEngine/
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/01/daimlerchrysler.html

Whats also really cool is that clean diesels block not just CO2, but they also block far more NOx (which forms Ozone) and N20 (a super potent green house gas from gasoline catalytic converters). And instead it converts it to inert N2.

Just on carbon emmisions alone, a turbo diesel engine is 33% better than the equivalent gasoline engine. Incluing the nitrogen reductions.

A Jetta Diesel is about comprable to a Prius.

Hell, the European Diesel version of the Scion xA gets 90mpg highway.

All the while Diesels offer some amazing torque increases over gasoline. (Roughly 20% increase)

Mix that in with a mild hybrid system, that uses an electric motor and a small battery instead of an alternator.
And you can have a hummer beating out most sedans in mileage.

_

One again, have your cake and eat it too.


67 posted on 04/09/2007 9:39:49 PM PDT by GreyFlcn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

By the way,
Incase you actually read the law, it doesn’t neccisarily change the price of the car.

Since all the fees and rebates are given directly to the manufacturers.
The manufacturers are free to set the prices however they feel like.

So it’s more of a “car manufacturer competition” using dynamic market based mechanisms of both carrots and sticks.

Best part of it all, it doesn’t cost tax payers a thin dime to fund all this. Since the losing manufacturers pay the winners.


68 posted on 04/09/2007 9:39:50 PM PDT by GreyFlcn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga; river rat

For mass transit to work, a city has to be sufficiently urbanized. That is not true in LA nor Atlanta. The trend in Atlanta has reversed and more and more and moving back into the city as even the suburbs are impossible to traverse. It takes me 45 min at times just to go from one side of Alpharetta to the other.

I don’t think that the Marta subway is all that bad. I do think that major mistakes were made in the building of lines though. I live off of windward in Alpharetta and would love for the rail line to come all the way up. I don’t have to commute to downtown for work, but I would like it for trips to the airport and to sporting events.

I want MARTA to work - not for global warming reasons but to make the city livable without 8 hours a day of gridlock.


69 posted on 04/10/2007 6:44:12 AM PDT by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
It bothers me every time SUVs are dismissed as being not as efficient as smaller cars. Or that driving slower is somehow more efficient than driving fast. That is such a narrow use of the term 'efficient' and focuses only on energy usage. From Dictionary.com: ef·fi·cient /ɪˈfɪʃənt/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[i-fish-uhnt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite knowledge, skill, and industry; competent; capable. 2. satisfactory and economical to use. Why skip over the primary definition and judge vehicles or driving style by the secondary definition ? A vehicle's purpose is not simply to move a person from one place to another. Its purpose is to do so comfortably, safely, and quickly. Driving an SUV 80mph may be less energy-efficient, but it is much more efficient in achieving the comfort, safety, and speed goals than driving some Prius at 55mph.
70 posted on 04/11/2007 11:29:20 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (Liberals aren't atheists. They worship government -- including human sacrifices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

sounds like justifiable regicide.


71 posted on 04/11/2007 11:30:50 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Don't eat Spinich. The spinich growers are against the war and funding our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson