So does this mean Trent Lott gets his job back too?
1 posted on
04/06/2007 5:01:51 PM PDT by
llevrok
To: llevrok
I think it was wrong to call them hos, but they did look rather masculine to me.
2 posted on
04/06/2007 5:03:58 PM PDT by
Perdogg
(Cheney-Bolton 2008)
To: llevrok
I am surprised Imus is getting this much heat...after all, he is a friend of the MSM, Fat Timmy, Sissy Chrissy, and Andy Mitchell...
3 posted on
04/06/2007 5:04:50 PM PDT by
Txsleuth
To: llevrok
Gregory Lee, an NABJ officer and senior assistant sports editor at The Boston Globe, said the mea culpa did little to atone for the comments. "This kind of behavior must be punished. I hope the company and sponsors he has take some sort of action ... to educate him.'' A re-education sensitivity training camp, I suspect he means.
4 posted on
04/06/2007 5:06:04 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: llevrok
Imus should’ve turned on some music and “rapped” it. Then it would be okay.
5 posted on
04/06/2007 5:06:05 PM PDT by
Redgirl
(Eternity is a very long time, especially towards the end. - S. Hawking)
To: llevrok
"This kind of behavior must be punished. I hope the company and sponsors he has take some sort of action ...
to educate him."
Libs are big on "re-education".
7 posted on
04/06/2007 5:22:19 PM PDT by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Veritas. Gravitas. Ohmygas.)
To: llevrok
From my personal (male) standpoint, tattoos on men’s basketball players aren’t cool, and tattoos on women players are downright disgusting.
To: llevrok
what’s this “WE,” white man?
12 posted on
04/06/2007 5:46:20 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: llevrok
Does this mean that posters here really give a rat’s ass what that foul old skeleton named Imus says about anything?
Is’nt anybody here just too big and otherwise involved with the real world to have even a micro-second to waste on such foolishness?
13 posted on
04/06/2007 5:54:59 PM PDT by
CBart95
(ackup)
To: llevrok
I am not a friend of PC, but what Imus called these young women was utterly reprehensible. He threw the team and the University right into the crapper.
15 posted on
04/06/2007 5:56:57 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: llevrok
Is true...thats what they look like.
20 posted on
04/06/2007 7:09:44 PM PDT by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
To: llevrok
23 posted on
04/06/2007 7:23:48 PM PDT by
Teacher317
(Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?)
To: llevrok
..."You can apologize, but what does that mean when you have a history of making disparaging remarks about people?'' Lee asked about the acid-tongued Imus...it's okay when those disparaging remarks about the likes of Bush and Rice, but you'd better not dis a bunch of women basketball players.......
To: llevrok
If you listen to the tape, you can hear liquor bottles rolling around in the background.
Why isn’t he being barbequed on a spit over this? I bet if it was a conservative, well, you guys know what would happen.
29 posted on
04/06/2007 9:47:26 PM PDT by
srotaG adirolF
(Hater of all things democRat)
To: llevrok
I have been an Imus listener and Imus-watcher for years. Here's my take on the whole deal, FWIW:
We all know that libs and demonrats are immune to charges of racism because, well, they're dems and libs, and they support the canon of required causes such as abortion, government programs for whatever, gun control, gay sex wherever it can be, etc. etc. Imus, however, takes it one step further.
This self-obsessed piece of sh*t innoculates himself and his fellow travelers yet more by cloaking himself in charity work. One of the Jewish sages (it might have been Maimonides) catalogued the degrees of goodness that charitable giving can have, whereas the highest order is total anonymity of the donor, and the lowest level of giving is to broadcast your giving. Well, if that's the case, Imus is off the charts on the low end.
While he does do good with his charities (SIDS Foundation, Imus Ranch for Kids with Cancer, and others) he NEVER EVER stops talking about it and how great he and his wife are. This extra step (he feels) further innoculates him from criticism from whatever he does or says.
Also, he is clever and sometimes very funny when he is not being vulgar, offensive or demeaning to people.
34 posted on
04/07/2007 4:14:08 AM PDT by
Pharmboy
([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
To: llevrok
Don Imus has such a terrically informative and interesting program. I wouldn't miss it for the world.
Is he on late night?
39 posted on
04/07/2007 5:16:15 AM PDT by
mborman
(No Rudys, please!)
To: llevrok
Maybe its the kneepads, but I tend to think that the volleyballers are far cuter:
46 posted on
04/07/2007 7:15:07 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson