Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney asserts Iraq-al Qaeda link ~ on radio show: "They were present before we invaded Iraq."
BBC ^ | Friday, 6 April 2007, 16:11 GMT 17:11 UK | BBC Staff

Posted on 04/06/2007 10:54:47 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Cheney asserts Iraq-al Qaeda link

Vice-President Dick Cheney

Dick Cheney said al-Qaeda was working in Iraq before the 2003 war

US Vice-President Dick Cheney has repeated his assertion that the al-Qaeda network had links with Iraq before the US-led invasion of 2003.

Mr Cheney told a US radio show: "They were present before we invaded Iraq."

Hours earlier, a declassified Pentagon report said information obtained from Iraq's former leader Saddam Hussein had confirmed they had no strong ties.

Its publication followed pressure from Democrats who suggest intelligence was twisted in the run-up to the war.

The belief that Saddam Hussein's regime and al-Qaeda were working together was an important element in the Bush administration's case for invading Iraq.

Critics have since suggested the administration "cherry-picked" from available intelligence to bolster that case.

'Inappropriate' intelligence

Mr Cheney, in an interview with conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh, insisted there had been a link between Saddam Hussein's regime and the al-Qaeda terror group.

He said former al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had been leading the network's operations in the country before the 2003 US-led invasion.

Osama bin Laden with followers
The US still does not know where al-Qaeda head Osama bin Laden is

"He took up residence there before we ever launched into Iraq, organised the al-Qaeda operations inside Iraq before we even arrived on the scene and then, of course, led the charge for Iraq until we killed him last June," he told the show.

The newly declassified Pentagon report was based on interrogations of Saddam Hussein and two of his aides, as well as documents seized in Iraq.

The Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Carl Levin, had pushed for its full release after it was released in summary form in February.

In a statement on Thursday, he said the document showed why a defence department investigation had concluded that some Pentagon pre-war intelligence work had been "inappropriate".

The report into former Pentagon policy chief Douglas Feith's handling of intelligence on Iraq was prepared by the defence department's top watchdog, Inspector General Thomas Gimble.

Under repeated questioning by Mr Levin in February, Mr Gimble said the conclusions reached in reports by Mr Feith were not fully supported by the available intelligence.

In particular, his conclusion there was a "mature and symbiotic relationship" between Iraq and al-Qaeda could not be justified on the basis of the available intelligence.

In addition, an alleged meeting between an Iraqi intelligence officer and a leader of the 9/11 attacks, Mohamed Atta, never took place.

Mr Feith's supporters stress that the inspector general found no evidence of illegal or unauthorised activity.




TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqueda; cheney; iraq; zarqawi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2007 10:54:52 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; blam; SunkenCiv; Marine_Uncle; Allegra; Dog; Coop; ...

I will go with Cheney’s statements over anything coming from Congress where the Demo’s have a hand in twisting any report....


2 posted on 04/06/2007 10:57:14 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Funny how all intelligence reports supporting Democrat talking points are 100% correct and gospel, while every intelligence report opposing them is “manipulated”,”cherry picked”, “falsified” and “Agenda driven”.

Good on ya Cheney.


3 posted on 04/06/2007 10:59:10 AM PDT by SolidWood (Islam is an insanity cult that makes everyone act Arab)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

So in other words Democrats are taking the word of Saddam over Cheney. No surprise there.


4 posted on 04/06/2007 11:00:39 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
He said former al-Qaeda in Iraq leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had been leading the network's operations in the country before the 2003 US-led invasion

So is Levin saying that Zarqawi wasn't operating in Iraq?

5 posted on 04/06/2007 11:04:20 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Precisely! Look who’s doing the ‘Cherry Picking’.


6 posted on 04/06/2007 11:04:22 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

BBC would go with Kos, DU or the HuffPost before they’d actually check the solid facts.


7 posted on 04/06/2007 11:06:07 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The Iraq-Al Queda link was the reason that Bill Clinton launched a Cruise Missile attack on the Pharmaceutical Plant in Khartoum.


8 posted on 04/06/2007 11:07:42 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Vice President Cheney is absolutely correct.

2002 Iraqi Document: Zarqawi in Iraq Long Before the War Started http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1598259/posts

9 posted on 04/06/2007 11:07:54 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It was regarded as common knowledge and widely reported prior to Bush becoming President that Saddam Hussein was a supporter of international terrorism, which he was, including connections to Al-Qaeda (but there are of course a lot more terrorists than just Al-Qaeda). Here is one example of this reporting (video):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWFWCg1BdRg


10 posted on 04/06/2007 11:09:03 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Does anyone dispute the Zarqawi was in Iraq before we invaded?


11 posted on 04/06/2007 11:10:14 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Giuliani: A strict constructionist judge can come to either conclusion about Roe against Wade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
2002 Iraqi Document: Zarqawi in Iraq Long Before the War Started

The DBM didn't have time to peruse through all those documents... they needed to get Democrats elected!

12 posted on 04/06/2007 11:13:14 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Issue in Doubt." -Col. David Monroe Shoup, USMC 1943)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; tubebender

Levin, compared to Cheney, is a lump-jawed, cross-eyed, bow-legged ameoba jockey who suffers from Gravitas Envy!!!


13 posted on 04/06/2007 11:14:40 AM PDT by SierraWasp (CA is pleagued with a GANG-GREENOUS REPELLICAN GOVERNOR!!! He's worsened the Gray Davis' MESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Al Qaeda was In Iraq at least one year before Operation Iraqi Freedom so they were be able to establish an infrastructure in the country, recruit terrorists, know the area, know the roads, hide weapon cashes, have safety houses etc… Only fools and/or Bush haters like the democrats and their media would think that they were able to do all this after the toppling of Saddam terrorist regime.


14 posted on 04/06/2007 11:16:14 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The real "cherry-picking" takes place when the left/media define their categories so as to achieve the conclusion they desire. Boil it down and their whole argument is little other than a word game. What is "cherry-picked" are the definitions of terms, and the conclusions we are meant to be allowed to draw from those definitions.

This report says there were no "strong ties", which supposedly refutes Cheney. But what's a "strong" tie? Were there "weak ties", then? And those don't count? Are "strong ties" the only kind of "ties" we're allowed to count? Who decides whether a "tie" is "strong"? (The left?) Basically, here's what the real definition is: "strong ties" are any ties that are stronger than... whatever ties Iraq may have had with Al Qaeda. Thus, Iraq (by definition - because they defined it this way) didn't have "strong ties" with Al Qaeda, and (therefore) Bush etc. are liars because they said otherwise (<-this part's just a plain old straw man; even here Cheney's only saying Al Qaeda was in Iraq, and nothing about "ties").

Similar phenomenon occurs with the definition of "Al Qaeda" itself. Obviously, Zarqawi was in Iraq. But the left really, really wants to always be able to say "Al Qaeda had nothing to do with Iraq". Solution? Simple: even if he was in Iraq before the invasion, Zarqawi "wasn't in Al Qaeda" at the time. Same person, but not "in Al Qaeda", therefore Iraq = no ties to Al Qaeda (even if there were ties to Zarqawi!), thus Bush lied etc. The question of just why exactly we're supposed to care, necessarily, whether someone like Zarqawi is "in Al Qaeda" or "not in Al Qaeda" at any given time, or even whether being "in Al Qaeda" is necessarily such a well-defined thing in the first place, is never answered. The formula is simple: whatever ties you find to whatever terrorists, just insist that they weren't "in Al Qaeda" at the time of the ties. According to the left, this makes it ok and it makes fighting them wrong. We're only allowed to care about people who are officially "in Al Qaeda" for some reason.

The entire approach is fundamentally intellectually dishonest and impossible to take seriously anymore.

15 posted on 04/06/2007 11:18:33 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ramzi Yousef was an al-Quaeda trained operative. There is also significant evidence that he was at least supported by Iraqi intelligence.

"THE WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMB: Who is Ramzi Yousef? And Why It Matters", Laurie Mylroie, The National Interest, 1995

He's still alive in prison in Colorado, last I heard. I wonder if anyone's asked him about it lately.
16 posted on 04/06/2007 11:21:09 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Democracy is the tyranny of all over all. Gingrich/Bolton '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In addition, an alleged meeting between an Iraqi intelligence officer and a leader of the 9/11 attacks, Mohamed Atta, never took place.

CIA rather fiercely maintains that the meeting never took place, each time the Czechs reported that the meeting did occur, within an hour the CIA would race to the phones to "leak" to the press that it was a lie, that it had never happened. The president of the Czech Republic himself came out and repeated it, a couple of times, and again CIA falls all over itself to "leak" within minutes that it never happened.

So that has become the commonly accepted story, at least outside Czech intel circles. Never happened.

Of course, when you dig into it, what you find is that CIA's claim that it "never happened" becomes considerably weaker. In the fine print, you find that they merely "can't confirm it". It never happened, because they can't confirm it, and they can't confirm it because they didn't have anyone on the scene.

Thats it. Thats the basis of the denial.

Its the old bogus sophomore philosophy conundrum, if the tree falls in the forest, with only the loggers there to see it, CIA can't confirm it, so the tree is still standing, as far as we can tell.

17 posted on 04/06/2007 11:26:22 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Al Queda was in the U.S. and all of Europe, but not in Iraq? These people get tied up in the planning and events of 9/11 and not the truth.

Cheney couldn't make it any clearer and those that disagree just ignore his actual point.

18 posted on 04/06/2007 11:28:41 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The Saddam-Osama Connection: The Terrorist Testimony
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23264
By Mark Eichenlaub
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 7, 2006

One of the pillars of the argument that there were “no links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda” is that the captured/defected members from both sides have denied any relationship existed. (The Left makes this claim even though most of the detainees’ interrogation logs remain classified and their contents remain on a need-to-know basis.) This “no connection” claim has been made a number of times, and those making it generally receive favorable media attention; they’re rarely if ever confronted with testimony that conflicts with their argument. I will not argue on behalf of the truthfulness of former Ba’athists and al-Qaeda members, but if their testimony is going to admitted, shouldn’t critics also hear the testimony of those in custody who tell a different story?

There are more than a few former Iraqi officials and captured al-Qaeda affiliates who have revealed examples of cooperation between Saddam’s Iraq and Osama’s terrorist assets.

· “Abu Mohammed,” a former colonel of Saddam Hussein’s Fedayeen fighters, told reporters long ago that Iraq was training terrorists, including al-Qaeda.

Gwynne Roberts, Sunday Times, July 14, 2002

· Iraqi soldiers, captured during the early phases of the war on Iraq in 2003, revealed that al-Qaeda terrorists were present inside Iraq fighting alongside Iraqi troops Gethin Chamberlain, The Scotsman, 10-28-03

· Hamsiraji Sali, Commander of the al-Qaeda affiliate Abu Sayyaf, admitted receiving $20,000 dollars a year from Iraq. Marc Lerner, Washington Times, 3-4-03

· Salah Suleiman, revealed that he was a former Iraqi Intelligence officer, captured on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border shuttling between Iraq and Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Janes Foreign Report, 9-19-01

· Jamal al-Qurairy, a former General in Iraq’s Mukhabarat, who defected years ago, said “that [is] ours” immediately after seeing 9/11 attacks.

David Rose, Vanity Fair, Feb. 2003, and David Rose, The Observer, 3-16-03

· Abbas al-Janabai, a personal assistant to Uday Hussein for 15 years, has repeatedly stated that there was a connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden that included training terrorists at various camps in Iraq.

CNN, 7-23-2003

Gwynne Roberts, Sunday Times, July 14,2002

Richard Miniter, TechCentralStation, 9-25-03

· Two Moroccan associates of Osama bin Laden, arrested in Rabat in Nov 98, confirmed that Col Khairallah al-Tikriti, the brother of Iraq’s top Intelligence official (Mukhabarat), was the case officer in charge of operations with al-Qaeda in Kashmir and Manila

Jacquard, Roland, In the Name of Osama Bin Laden, Duke University Press, 2002, pg.112

· Wali Khan Amin Shah, an al-Qaeda operative in custody, told the FBI that Abu

Hajer al-Iraq had good contacts with Iraq Intelligence Services (reported to Senate Intelligence Committee)

Stephen Hayes, Thomas Joscelyn, Weekly Standard, 7-18-05

· Farouk Hijazi, former #3 in Saddam Hussein’s Mukhabarat, although he denies the well documented reports of his later meetings with bin Laden, Hijazi admits that he met with Osama bin Laden to discuss antiship mines and terror training camps in Iraq during the mid-90’s.

9-11 Commission, Staff Statement 15

· Abdul Rahman al-Shamari, who served in Saddam Hussein’s Mukhabarat from 1997-2002, says that he worked to link Saddam Hussein regime with Ansar al Islam and al-Qaeda.

Preston Mendenhall, MSNBC, “War Diary”

Jonathan Schanzer, Weekly Standard, 3-1-04

· Mohamed Gharib, Ansar al Islam’s Media chief, later admitted that the group took assistance from Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor, 10-16-03

· Mohamed Mansour Shahab, aka Muhammad Jawad, is a smuggler who claims to have been hired by Iraq to bring weapons to al-Qaeda in Afghanistan

Jeffrey Goldberg, New Yorker, 3-25-02

Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor, 4-03-02

Richard Miniter, TechCentralStation, 9-25-03

· Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi is a senior al-Qaeda operative. Although he has changed his story, he initially told his captors that his mission was to travel to Iraq to acquire poisons and gases from Iraqi Intelligence after impressing them with al-Qaeda’s attack on the USS Cole

Stephen Hayes, Weekly Standard, 11-24-03

· An “enemy combatant” being held at Guantanamo Bay, who was also a former Iraqi Army officer, admits that he served as a liaison between Osama bin Laden and Iraqi Intelligence. He was arrested in Pakistan before completing joint IIS/al-Qaeda mission to blow up U.S. and British embassies

Associated Press, 3-30-05

Stephen Hayes, Thomas Joscelyn. Weekly Standard. 7-18-05

· Abu Hajer al-Iraqi (aka Mahmdouh Mahmud Salim) told prosecutors that he was bin Laden’s best friend and in charge of trying and procure WMD materials from Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.

Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review, 6-17-04

Stephen Hayes, Weekly Standard, 11-24-03

· A “Former Senior (Iraqi) Intelligence Officer” has told U.S. officials that a flurry of activity between Saddam Hussein’s regime and al-Qaeda took place in early and late 1998, the meeting point was Baghdad’s Intelligence station in Pakistan

Stephen Hayes, Weekly Standard, 11-24-03

· Wafiq al-Sammarrai, former head of Iraq’s Military Intelligence before defecting in 1994, stated that Saddam Hussein has agents “inside” al-Qaeda

Laurie Mylroie, “Study of Revenge”

· Khidir Hamza, Saddam Hussein’s former top WMD official, says that Saddam had connections to al-Qaeda

CNN, 10-15-01

PBS Frontline “Gunning For Saddam”

· Abu Zeinab al-Qurairy , a former high-ranking officer in Iraq’s Mukhabarat, told PBS Frontline and the New York Times that the September 11 attackers were trained in Salman Pak, as were other members of al-Qaeda

PBS Frontline “Gunning For Saddam”

· Sabah Khodada, a former Captain in Iraq’s Army, told PBS Frontline and the New York Times that the terrorist training camp at Salman Pak included the training of al-Qaeda members airplane hijacking

PBS Frontline “Gunning For Saddam”

· An “Iraqi Defector,” who spent 16 years working for Iraq’s Mukhabarat, told the Iraqi National Congress that Saddam Hussein’s illegal oil revenues helped fund al-Qaeda (story later corroborated by Claudia Rosett )

Radio Free Europe 9-29-2002

· Khalil Ibrahim Abdallah, a captured senior Iraqi official, said that IIS agents had met with bin Laden until the middle of 1999

Stephen Hayes, Weekly Standard, 11-24-03

· Qassem Hussein Mohamed, who served in Iraq’s Mukhabarat for 20 years, told reporters that Saddam Hussein has been secretly aiding, arming and funding Ansar al Islam and al-Qaeda for several years

Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor, 4-2-02

Jeffrey Goldberg, New Yorker, 3-25-02

· Dr. Mohammed al-Masri, a known al-Qaeda spokesman, told the Sunday Times that Saddam Hussein contacted the “Arab Afghans” (al-Qaeda) in 2001. Al-Masri also said that Saddam even went so far as to fund the movement of some al-Qaeda members into Iraq and then later supplied them with arms caches and money, later to be used in insurgent attacks. Abdel Bari Atwan, Sunday Times, 2-26-06 via Thomas Joscelyn, “Saddam, the Insurgency, and the Terrorists, 3-28-06

· Hudayfa Azzam, the son of bin Laden’s former mentor, told reporters in 2004, “Saddam Hussein’s regime welcomed them with open arms and young al-Qaeda members entered Iraq in large numbers, setting up an organization to confront the occupation.” AFP, 8-30-04 Thomas Joscelyn, “What Else Did Hudayfa Azzam Have To Say About Al-Qaeda In Iraq?” 4-3-06

· Hudayfa Azzam, the son of bin Laden’s mentor Abdullah Azzam, has said Iraq’s government worked closely with al-Qaeda before the war and welcomed a number of members in after they left Afghanistan and armed and funded them Thomas Joscelyn citing AFP, 8-30-04

· Dr. Mohammed al-Masri, a known al-Qaeda spokesman, told the Sunday Times that Saddam Hussein contacted the “Arab Afghans” (al-Qaeda) in 2001. Abdel Bari Atwan, Sunday Times, 2-26-06 via Thomas Joscelyn, “Saddam, the Insurgency, and the Terrorists,” 3-28-06

· Haqi Ismail, a Mosul native with relatives at the top of Iraq’s Mukhabarat and spent time in al-Qaeda/al Ansar camps in Afghanistan and Northern Iraq before being caught by Kurdish security, indicated that he was working for Saddam Hussein’s Intelligence Service (Mukhabarat)

Jeffrey Goldberg, New Yorker, 3-25-02

· Moammar Ahmad Yussef, a captured deputy of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, told officials that Iraq provided money, weapons, fake passports, safe haven and training to al-Qaeda members

Dan Darling, Winds of Change, 11-21-03

· A “top Saddam Hussein official,” who was also a senior Intelligence official, says that Iraq made a secret pact with Ayman al-Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad and later al-Qaeda. Secret meetings between the two sides began in 1992.

Stephen Hayes, Weekly Standard, 11-24-03

· Abu Zubaydah, a high ranking al-Qaeda operative in U.S. custody, has said that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had good contacts with Iraqi Intelligence Services

Thomas Joscelyn, Weekly Standard, December 2, 2005

· Abu Iman al-Baghdadi, a 20-year veteran of Iraqi intelligence, told BBC news that Saddam Hussein is funding and arming Ansar al-Islam to fend off anti-Saddam Kurds

Jim Muir, BBC, July 24, 2002

Surely, much more detail is locked away in the classified interrogation logs of other captured al-Qaeda fighters and former Baathists in custody. (I have filed an FOIA request for a few.) Those who may have some answers would be the big name al-Qaeda fighters who were caught in Iraq and the captured Baathists in custody caught after the war terrorizing with Zarqawi and his affiliates. But what we know already should make us discount the “no connection” argument made by partisans denying reality.


19 posted on 04/06/2007 11:32:19 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

http:/www.9-11commission.gov/
9/11 Commission Report: Final Report Documents Iraq/alQaeda Link
National Commission on Terrorsit Attacks ^ | July 2004 | 9/11 Commission

Posted on 07/30/2004 6:33:08 PM EDT by beebuster2000

The 9/11 Commission Report is extraordinarily well written, reads like a gripping novel and contains many startling and astounding revelations. Probably most of what you think you know about 9/11 and the 15 years of terror activity leading up to it is wrong.

But no documentation from the report is more astounding, or has been more mis-reported than the links between Osama Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. After the media blitz, you are probably under the impression that “no ties existed”?

How wrong you are, according to the report. Here are a few quotes from the body of the report:

Page 66:

“In March 1998, after Bin Ladin’s public fatwa against the United States , two al Qaeda members reportedly went to Iraq to meet with Iraq intelligence. In July, an Iraqi delegation traveled to Afghanistan to meet first with the Taliban and then with Bin Ladin. Sources reported that one, or perhaps both of these meetings was apparently arranged through Bin Ladin’s Egyptian deputy, Zawahiri, who had ties of his own to the Iraqis.”

Page 66:

“According to the reporting, Iraqi officials offered Bin Ladin a safe haven in Iraq . Bin Ladin declined, apparently judging that his circumstances in Afghanistan remained more favorable than the Iraqi alternative. The reports describe friendly contacts and indicate some common themes in both sides’ hatred of the United States .”

Page 128:

On November 4, 1998 , the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York unsealed its indictment of Bin Ladin, charging him with conspiracy to attack U.S. defense installations. The indictment also charged that al Qaeda had allied itself with Sudan , Iran , and Hezbollah. The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had “reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.” This passage led (Richard) Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was “probably a direct result of the Iraq-Al Qaida agreement” Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the “exact formula used by Iraq”.

The 9/11 report does say that “no evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out attacks against the United States (page 66)” were documented.

But given the voluminous reports of repetitive contact between Iraq and al Qaeda, wouldn’t any responsible and forceful President of the Untied States correctly conclude that action against both al Qaeda and Iraq was prudent. And wouldn’t a bold and courageous leader take such action if International bodies failed to heed the warning and disarm Iraq according to their own numerous resolutions?

Oh, I guess a President did take such action.


20 posted on 04/06/2007 11:33:30 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8...down to 3..GWB, we hardly knew ye...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson