Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RDTF

The thing is,, we need enough of these to shoot down waves of thousands of missiles. Whenever a representation of an attack is shown, it is always of a few missiles. What would happen should they lob hundreds hour after hour. I never bought into this “first strike” thing. We need millions of these interceptors all over our nation.


12 posted on 04/06/2007 9:45:36 AM PDT by freemike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: freemike

The Wright bros didn’t try to load a couple of hundred people for a trans-Atlantic flight while they were testing their powered glider either.


14 posted on 04/06/2007 9:49:27 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: patton; Doohickey; neverdem; theDentist; NicknamedBob; Argh; Cyber Liberty; freemike
The thing is,, we need enough of these to shoot down waves of thousands of missiles. Whenever a representation of an attack is shown, it is always of a few missiles. What would happen should they lob hundreds hour after hour. I never bought into this “first strike” thing. We need millions of these interceptors all over our nation.

Not really true: IF (big IF) Russia were shooting thousands of missiles at us, yes we would need (incoming missiles + 1) counter missiles.

But, North Korea has only a handful of long range missiles, and none are successfully tested. Yet. Only 2-6 nuclear weapons - and they would come from a very limited area under most reasonable circumstances.

So only one counter battery CAN remove most of the threat. Which is better than the democrats tactic: Surrender immediately because WE can’t be trusted with NAY defensive weapon, while THEY can be trusted NOT to develop ANY offensive weapon.

ONE counter battery means that NK needs

16 posted on 04/06/2007 9:59:19 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: freemike
The thing is,, we need enough of these to shoot down waves of thousands of missiles.

That's not what we are doing. We are building a system that can take down a handfull of missiles shot in our direction by a 'rougue nation'. Russia, & increasingly China, could very cheaply saturate any system that we could build with ballistic hit-to-kill technology.

You'd have to build something like the orbiting "Brilliant Pebbles" system to take out a larger attack. The technology for that is still largely on the drawing boards from what I understand.

22 posted on 04/06/2007 10:44:54 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: freemike; Tallguy; MrB
What would happen should they lob hundreds hour after hour

Then NORAD is a complete failure in that case.

After the initial attack wave, you're in a hot war and we'd better be saturating targets in the attacker's backyard before "hour after hour"

31 posted on 04/06/2007 12:03:32 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: freemike
The thing is,, we need enough of these to shoot down waves of thousands of missiles

Which country is preparing a wave of thousands of missiles?

40 posted on 04/06/2007 2:45:01 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson