The thing is,, we need enough of these to shoot down waves of thousands of missiles. Whenever a representation of an attack is shown, it is always of a few missiles. What would happen should they lob hundreds hour after hour. I never bought into this “first strike” thing. We need millions of these interceptors all over our nation.
The Wright bros didn’t try to load a couple of hundred people for a trans-Atlantic flight while they were testing their powered glider either.
Not really true: IF (big IF) Russia were shooting thousands of missiles at us, yes we would need (incoming missiles + 1) counter missiles.
But, North Korea has only a handful of long range missiles, and none are successfully tested. Yet. Only 2-6 nuclear weapons - and they would come from a very limited area under most reasonable circumstances.
So only one counter battery CAN remove most of the threat. Which is better than the democrats tactic: Surrender immediately because WE can’t be trusted with NAY defensive weapon, while THEY can be trusted NOT to develop ANY offensive weapon.
ONE counter battery means that NK needs
That's not what we are doing. We are building a system that can take down a handfull of missiles shot in our direction by a 'rougue nation'. Russia, & increasingly China, could very cheaply saturate any system that we could build with ballistic hit-to-kill technology.
You'd have to build something like the orbiting "Brilliant Pebbles" system to take out a larger attack. The technology for that is still largely on the drawing boards from what I understand.
Then NORAD is a complete failure in that case.
After the initial attack wave, you're in a hot war and we'd better be saturating targets in the attacker's backyard before "hour after hour"
Which country is preparing a wave of thousands of missiles?