Replies

And that's exactly the point. Based on Rudy Giuliani's own track record and previous statements on this issue, I have a hard time believing he would not be closer to Bill Clinton than to George W. Bush on this.

He didn't say he would change the law beyond where it stands right now, meaning federal funding for abortions in cases of rape, incest, and for the health of the mother. I don't get it. Are you saying he is lying? In that case I would ask you, why didn't he just lie and say he was pro-life? He knows it's a tough road for a pro-choice candidate in the GOP primaries.

136 posted on 04/06/2007 9:53:46 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul (If you think the world's dangerous, and you need a tough guy... that's me [Rudy] --Newt Gingrich)

He didn't say he would change the law beyond where it stands right now, meaning federal funding for abortions in cases of rape, incest, and for the health of the mother.

He wasn't asked a question that addressed this. The REAL question he needs to answer would be this:

"If you were president and a Democratic Congress passed a bill overturning the Hyde Amendment, would you veto it?"

137 posted on 04/06/2007 10:02:16 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)