To: aligncare
2 posted on
04/06/2007 8:25:32 AM PDT by
Clint N. Suhks
( Was crucified, died, and was buried. He descended into hell. On the third day He rose again.)
To: Clint N. Suhks
...proudly rejected Rudy’s nomination from day one!
3 posted on
04/06/2007 8:27:41 AM PDT by
lormand
(Michael Wiener - the tough talking populist moron, who claims to be a Conservative)
To: Clint N. Suhks
This was his ‘Howard Dean Scream’ moment.
To: Clint N. Suhks
I will NEVER knowingly vote for a child killer. He will not get my vote even if Hillary is the only other candidate. (Of course, she won’t get my vote, either.)
8 posted on
04/06/2007 8:32:17 AM PDT by
irishtenor
(Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
To: All
Rudy supporters:
Rudy started his campaign with great name recognition and some promises to pretend to be a conservative. As time goes on, these promises are being challenged.
As Rudy fails these challenges, so should your support for him.
11 posted on
04/06/2007 8:43:26 AM PDT by
kidd
To: Clint N. Suhks
"Ultimately, [abortion is] a constitutional right, and therefore, if it's a constitutional right, ... you have to make sure people are protected," Then where is my constitionally-mandated, federally-funded firearms voucher?
To: Clint N. Suhks
He later told Sean Hannity that he had misspoken and that he supported the Hyde Amendment, which bars most federal abortion funding.
I’m all in favor of government funding in cases of rape or incest or to save a mother’s life. I hope that’s what Rudy meant.
16 posted on
04/06/2007 8:58:21 AM PDT by
zook
To: Clint N. Suhks
I find it very odd, and consider it a serious "red flag," that Rudy Giuliani has never in his political career -- and even in any of his gyrations on this issue in recent days -- been able to utter the simple phrase: "I support the Hyde Amendment."
17 posted on
04/06/2007 8:59:22 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Clint N. Suhks; areafiftyone; BunnySlippers; PhiKapMom; FairOpinion
Rudy reiterated his previous position, and therefore such comments are not surprising. However, if he had changed his position, he would have been assailed as a flip-flopper who simply cannot be trusted.
IOW, a no-win situation, as there are some who are determined to use whatever he says to tear him apart.
19 posted on
04/06/2007 9:01:18 AM PDT by
freespirited
(Resentment, redistribution, and re-education. The three Rs of liberalism.)
To: Clint N. Suhks; newbie 10-21-00; Bloc8406; Ransomed; AliVeritas; The Klingon; dcnd9; fishhound; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
20 posted on
04/06/2007 9:01:21 AM PDT by
narses
("Freedom is about authority." - Rudolph Giuliani)
To: Clint N. Suhks
In addition to all the social issue problems Rudy has this statement shows us a serious flaw in his judgment/diplomacy skills. You have to question the judgement of any man who is trying to get the GOP nomination and says things like “Abortion is a constitutional right.” Think it if you want but to say it in those words shows arrogance, ignorance or some sort of political deathwish.
38 posted on
04/06/2007 9:40:21 AM PDT by
azcap
To: Clint N. Suhks
55 posted on
04/06/2007 10:49:13 AM PDT by
Old_Mil
(Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
97 posted on
04/06/2007 2:17:07 PM PDT by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: Clint N. Suhks
I would be willing to pay taxes for his lobotomy.
To: HitmanLV; areafiftyone; Alberta's Child
There is one thing I blame Rudy for not doing and that is not emphasizing that he isn't going to do anything much different than any Republican president has done so far, including Reagan. Most people don't know about the Hyde Amendment and the media preys on their lack of knowledge. By saying Rudy Giuliani supports federal funding for abortion, they make it sound like Rudy is anxious to create new laws to support federal funding for abortion, when in fact the Hyde Amendment has provided federal funding for some abortions and has been in effect since 1977. That means 3 decades of federal funding under 18 years of GOP presidents' watch.
And who is going to get rid of it? Giving lip service like oh, Roe vs Wade is a bad law, or, we shouldn't have abortions, abortion should be eliminated, but the question is, what are they going to do about it?
What is Thompson, Gingrich, Hunter or any other candidate going to do about federal funding for abortion? Is anyone going to ask this question? Their supporters probably prefer to just not know their answers.
Let's not forget that Bill Clinton expanded federal funds to include family planning counseling, and federal funding for abortions to groups overseas. GW Bush reversed Clinton's expanded federal funding and prohibited federal funding for family planning overseas.
Rudy said that he won't change the law as it stands right now, and I am absolutely certain Hillary will have no qualms about going back to her husband's policies and probably beyond them.
129 posted on
04/06/2007 9:15:22 PM PDT by
Victoria Delsoul
(If you think the world's dangerous, and you need a tough guy... that's me [Rudy] --Newt Gingrich)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson