Posted on 04/05/2007 9:31:14 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
Rudy Giuliani, NO Fiscal Conservative
By George Marlin
Wednesday, April 4, 2007
When Steve Forbes was seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 1996, then Mayor Rudy Giuliani ridiculed his proposal to scrap the federal income tax code and replace it with a simple flat-tax. Giuliani called Forbes plan a "mistake" and said if implemented "would really be a disaster."
Despite these smears, Steve Forbes now believes Rudy embraces the flat-tax concept and endorsed him for president claiming he "will inspire the next generation of the Reagan Revolution."
Apparently Forbes forgot that when running for mayor, Rudy Giuliani showcased his liberal credentials and boasted he would "rekindle the Rockefeller, Javits Lefkowitz tradition" of the Republican Party and "produce the kind of change New York City saw with Fiorella LaGuardia and with John Lindsay."
Here's a sampling of the change the Rockefeller-Lindsay brand of Republican liberalism gave New York: During Governor Rockefeller's 14-year tenure, he brought New York State to the verge of bankruptcy. When Rocky entered office, his first budget was $2 billion, when he left office his last budget was $8.7 billion. Thanks to 18 tax increases he signed into law, New Yorkers were the most heavily taxed citizens in the nation and their state had the highest public debt in the nation. Viewing the mess he inherited from Rockefeller, Democratic Governor Hugh Carey said: "I've seen delicatessens in bankruptcy in better shape than the State of New York."
The Upper East Side Republican-liberal social engineer mayor, John Lindsay, financed New York City's big government agenda with creative fiscal gimmicks including phantom revenues, capitalization of expenses, short-term debt rollovers, false revenue estimates and excessive long-term borrowing. And Lindsay increased nuisance taxes, water rates, sewer taxes, commercial rent tax and instituted the city personal income, general corporation and unincorporated business taxes.
Mayor Lindsay's reckless fiscal policies were directly responsible for the City's 1975 default on debt.
Following in their footsteps, Mayor Giuliani declared that pledging no new tax increases is "political pandering." He also said "when I ran for mayor both times, I was asked very, very often to do the following: Pledge that you will never raise taxes. I refused to do that. Pledge that you will lower taxes. I refused to do that."
When Giuliani endorsed liberal icon Mario Cuomo for governor in 1994, he called the Republican-Conservative George Pataki's 25 percent state income tax cut (cloned from the Forbes-inspired New Jersey income tax cut) "irresponsible" and a "shell game that would hurt everyone in the state."
Forbes points to Rudy's fiscal management of New York City as proof of his conservatism. "Giuliani," he claims, "turned an inherited deficit [$2.3 billion] into a multimillion dollar surplus." It's true that during Giuliani's first term when times were tough, he contained costs and made some tax cuts. But what Forbes failed to point out is that in Rudy's second term, when the economy was booming, he abandoned fiscal restraint and became a big-spending liberal. City budget expenditures jumped 25 percent – twice the inflation rate – and Giuliani left his successor a projected operating deficit of $4.5 billion and New York's citizens with the highest tax burden in any major municipality in America.
Rudy Giuliani, a legatee of Nelson Rockefeller and John Lindsay, fails on every fiscal and cultural issue that are dear to conservatives. And one can only hope that Steve Forbes and his friends will learn before it's too late that life-long liberal Rudy Giuliani is employing conservative rhetoric merely to patronize them.
George J. Marlin is an author, former Conservative Party nominee for mayor of the City of New York, former two term Executive Director and CEO of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
Rudy is NO conservative
And even at that, he's not the guy. He failed to move New York's ECC away from WTC 7 despite clearly-stated concerns by emergency professionals. He also pushed a corrupt crony for the most important anti-terror job in the country. Where he has had direct interaction with proactive WOT matters, he has failed miserably.
And Rudy has the nerve to constantly invoke Ronald Reagan in his campaign?
Ruby Julie Annie is no social conservative either. That puts him 0 for 2. Liberals crossdressing as a Conservatives is an attempt to bamboozle.
Let’s add in taxpayer funding for abortion as a failing of both fiscal and social conservatism. Guiliani reiterated such support only yesterday.
Rudy is Hillary in a man’s suit.
Rudy actively avoided the draft and has no military experience. Rudy has never held a position that dealt with foreign policy, the military, or war fighting. Rudy actively supported a sanctuary policy that would have given sanctuary to most of the foreign terrorists in this Country including three of the 911 terrorists.
What would make someone think Rudy has any type of background for conducting the WOT?
Rush played some of Rudy’s interview with Hannity yesterday. He said Rudy will remain in first place as long as he keeps talking like he was in that interview and describing the democrats for what they are.
Not to mention he used an act of sudden-jihad-syndrome at the Empire State Building as a prop for a gun control presser with Carolyn McCarthy.
Most liberal Republican to ever run for President.
Exactly. Yet we're supposed to believe he would never be tempted to sign a gun ban if offered by a Dem Congress. Especially one "justified" by a terror attack involving guns.
Meanwhile, Rudy's supporters make a big deal from of Rudy kicking Arafat out of a concert. Yet he refused to call the Empire State Building shooting an act of terror by a Palestinian. So much for his forcefullness against Islamic terrorists.
He like McCain has an “R” behind his name, that’s about it.
“Rudy is Hillary in a man’s suit.”
While still wearing panties...
McCain, at least, has a a decent ACU rating, even if he has turned into a dangerous, monomaniacal lunatic.
I still remember back when he did this and won't ever forget it.
As much as I like Rush, it has to be said. How is that “Don’t worry folks, the Democrats will never take the House or the Senate in 2006”, working for ya?
Does the Republican party REALLY need to nominate someone who isn't really a Republican to win? If so, then maybe the Republican Party should just fold it up, call the experiment in responsible self-government a failure, and go home and wait for the end.
That's what they say, but I suspect that most of them are liberals themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.