Posted on 04/05/2007 4:25:21 AM PDT by IrishMike
A right to self-defense is recognized by the Dalai Lama indeed, his predecessor tried to recruit an army. An al Qaeda organization is attempting to assassinate the Dalai Lama. Lashkar-e-Toiba, al Qaedas South Asian affiliate, is acting consistently with Osama bin Ladens April 2006 denunciation of pagan Buddhists. This raises an interesting question: Can an ethical follower of Tibetan Buddhism kill someone in order to save the Dalai Lama? Or in order to fight religious totalitarianism in general?
Absolutely yes. Although some Westerners imagine that the Dalai Lama is an absolute pacifist, the teachings of the present Dalai Lama and of his predecessor, as well as the traditions of Tibetan Buddhism, all legitimize the use of deadly force against killers and would-be tyrants.
This may come as news to certain anti-American pacifists in the United States and Europe who are guilty of Shangri-La-ism of what Jane Ardley (in her book The Tibetan Independence Movement) describes as the idealized, romantic vision of Tibet as a land of enlightened, non-violent, happy and exotic people. She observes, For those in the West who look to Tibetan Buddhism for all the answers to their insecurities, the image of violent Buddhists is uncomfortable particularly where Buddhism itself can be offered as a justification for their actions. The tradition of forceful resistance to tyranny is very old in Tibet. For example, in the early centuries of the first millennium, ancient Tantric Buddhist texts gave formulae for killing unjust kings (Thomas Cleary, Classics of Buddhism and Zen, vol. 5).
Buddhist Tibet was a powerful warrior kingdom during the latter part of the first millennium. Later, during the thirteenth century, Tibet fell under Mongol control. The Mongols respected Buddhism, granted Tibet internal autonomy, provided military protection, and exempted Tibetans from military service.
(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...
And don’t forget the Gurkhas from Nepal, who serve in both the British & Indian Armies, Buddhist Warriors as well.
And don’t forget the Gurkhas from Nepal, who serve in both the British & Indian Armies, Buddhist Warriors as well.
Err,nope-the vast majority of Gurkhas are Hindus,like most Nepalese.
Richard Gere and his gerbil will be most distressed to hear this.
Transcendence is never more relevant than for a soldier at war and fighting all the hardships of real hell.
Maybe someone wake the tree hugging special ed hyppies of our universities about this reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.