Posted on 04/04/2007 12:52:50 PM PDT by KantianBurke
TALLAHASSEE, Florida (CNN) -- Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani told CNN Wednesday he supports public funding for some abortions, a position he advocated as mayor and one that will likely put the GOP presidential candidate at odds with social conservatives in his party.
"Ultimately, it's a constitutional right, and therefore if it's a constitutional right, ultimately, even if you do it on a state by state basis, you have to make sure people are protected," Giuliani said in an interview with CNN's Dana Bash in Florida's capital city.
A video clip of the then-mayoral candidate issuing a similar declaration in 1989 in a speech to the "Women's Coalition" appeared recently on the Internet.
"There must be public funding for abortions for poor women," Giuliani says in the speech that is posted on the video sharing site YouTube. "We cannot deny any woman the right to make her own decisions about abortion."
When asked directly Wednesday if he still supported the use of public funding for abortions, Giuliani said "Yes."
"If it would deprive someone of a constitutional right," he explained, "If that's the status of the law, yes."
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
I can name serveral that fought to prevent federal funding of abortions.
I remember reading the Roe v Wade decision and what struck me was that it was not decided on the “right” of privacy, but on the right of self defense.
Going to term with a pregnancy was at the time much riskier than having an abortion. The judges felt that a woman had the right to decide whether she wanted to face the extra risk to her life by going to term.
Also, with the state of medicine at the time premature babies were not able to survive outside the womb like very young premies can today with medical advances in Pedriatrics ICU.
All this smokescreen about “right to privacy” is inaccurate as far as I could tell when I read Roe v Wade.
I’m looking into Governor Romney lately.
Looks like he still has his business acumen and can raise money for a good, solid race.
There doesn’t seem to be any record of military service. He went to college at the end of the Vietnam War era, and the lottery system came about then. Wonder what his lottery number was.
He’s evidentally turned a blind eye and deaf ear to ingrained liberal icons like abortion in his State of Massachusetts, but I don’t think he made as many compromises on those kind of issues as Rudy did to be elected in NYC. I think his basic values are family values and religious values. Obviously that’s not true for Rudy.
So, I am leaning toward supporting Romney, much as I love McCain’s stabbing us in the back every time he could get on the news /sarcasm, and much as I love Rudy for cleaning up NYC and his bravery and good management on 9/11. Those seem to be the top three contenders for now.
Rudy v Hiliary666 would mean I’d vote Rudy, but for now, Romney is my choice.
I sure hope he doesn’t go with the same prissy look which makes me wonder if he has the guts to kick our enemies in the nuts.
Probably graduated high school 1965, with college exemption up in 1969.
Draft lottery 1969: birthday March 12, 1947 = 350
Draft lottery 1970: birthday March 12 = 89
Sugar-coating a liberal with an (R) does not make him any safer. If anything, it makes him more dangerous.
No, it is not.
Rudy said he'd appoint strict constructionists. Therefore, he opens himself up to this kind of scrutiny. And fails it.
Thank you.
I will have to look into this.
This would then pose the question, “Is the government obligated to pay for an individual’s right to self defense?”
I think not. Exercising the right should not obligate another person(s) to action.
Imagine that. Wonder why?
LOL. Bye
You might want to read up on the second amendment and the doctrine of incorporation. The current SCOTUS precedent is Biltmore v. Barron, which held that there was no incorporation. Thus a state is free to make the possession of each and every gun held be a private citizen within its borders illegal.
SCOTUS may reverse that holding at some point (unlikely when it comes to incorporation), but until it does, the local gun laws in NYC are Constitutional.
I have come to learn that “Conservatives” have their own unique view of Constitutional Law.
Basically, everyone gets to decide on their own what is and isn’t Constitutional law, those nine people be damned.
Unless they vote our way.
Hell, I think we even have a rare meeting of the mind here between Liberal and Conservatives.
You’re wrong. Conservatives will support Rudy if he is the nominee. They always do. I wish it were otherwise but is is not.
You are taking two approaches, both at the same time. You are excusing Rudy on the one hand if he did say this. On the other, you are claiming that CNN reported it wrong.
In fact Rudy did say it - long since confirmed.
I don’t excuse it - I don’t agree with it.
But I am still support Rudy for POTUS.
Rudy will win regardless of the 1 hit wonders here. Rudy resonates with the American people. Freepers do not.
No, he doesn't.
Tax-funded abortion is extremely unpopular. When voters start to look at him closer, they're going to back away. They already are, judging from the polls.
He'll drop out by fall, I think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.