Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani stands by support of publicly-funded abortions
CNN ^ | April 4th, 2007

Posted on 04/04/2007 12:52:50 PM PDT by KantianBurke

TALLAHASSEE, Florida (CNN) -- Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani told CNN Wednesday he supports public funding for some abortions, a position he advocated as mayor and one that will likely put the GOP presidential candidate at odds with social conservatives in his party.

"Ultimately, it's a constitutional right, and therefore if it's a constitutional right, ultimately, even if you do it on a state by state basis, you have to make sure people are protected," Giuliani said in an interview with CNN's Dana Bash in Florida's capital city.

A video clip of the then-mayoral candidate issuing a similar declaration in 1989 in a speech to the "Women's Coalition" appeared recently on the Internet.

"There must be public funding for abortions for poor women," Giuliani says in the speech that is posted on the video sharing site YouTube. "We cannot deny any woman the right to make her own decisions about abortion."

When asked directly Wednesday if he still supported the use of public funding for abortions, Giuliani said "Yes."

"If it would deprive someone of a constitutional right," he explained, "If that's the status of the law, yes."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; constitution; giuliani; prolife; rudy08; rudy2008; stoprudy2008; taxpayerdollars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 461-473 next last
To: KATIE-O

Thanks for that KATIE-O.

With all the responsibilities and burdens on the office of the President - I don’t like seeing abortion used for or against any candidate - it’s unfair.

You cannot win - you cannot lose - you only squirm in your seat and hope to offend as few people as possible.

Horrible issue - awful.


241 posted on 04/04/2007 2:41:14 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Yeah Ok - I’m a big liar.

Thanks for that.


242 posted on 04/04/2007 2:42:11 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

“Also - as the D.C. court decision just showed us - we’re all safe from anyone attacking the 2nd amendment.”

You have to be truly delusional to think that. Google HR 1022.


243 posted on 04/04/2007 2:43:22 PM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: free_for_now

“Isn’t paying poor people to kill their kids racist?”
“if liberal Democrats have proportionately more abortions..”
Had a chart once that showed that about the libs. The stats on abortion by race show that blacks are losing a lot of children that way. (and probably why hispanics will be the new “big” minority) Your tagline is correct!


244 posted on 04/04/2007 2:43:42 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

I’m all in favor of backing away from socialism. But it’s not going to happen while welfare addicts, who are inherently pro-socialism and often violent if they don’t get their “entitlements”, are reproducing a lot faster than productive citizens.

Actually, the history of socialist approaches to population control is not one-sided. In Soviet-era Romania, the people were so miserable that they were choosing not to reproduce, and the government decided it had to force its breeder-subjects to breed more bodies to staff the military and industrial schemes of the leaders. Having babies was mandatory, and women who were failing to get and stay pregnant were forced to undergo medical exams, and if found to be using any sort of contraceptive or having had abortions, they (and their husbands if they were married) were punished with the loss of their state-provided housing (the only housing available) and their state-provided jobs (the only jobs available). Abortion and contraception were allowed only for women who were over 40 or had at least 4 children, and the law was later changed to limit these options to women who were over 45 or had more than 5 children.


245 posted on 04/04/2007 2:44:22 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O; Jake The Goose
“.....Name a single POTUS who did anything to stop abortions? You can’t - it has nothing to do with being President. Awful issue - really tears at peoples hearts. So tough to talk about with someone on the other side of whatever stance you take yourself. It’s 100% emotion. I hope one day we can get away from it.....” You are absolutely right, Jake. We’ve had any 3 pro-life Presidents in the past few years and abortion is still the law of the land. It is unreasonable to expect a POTUS to do anything about it and Rudy has already said he will NOT have a pro-abortion agenda.

All you Rutards are so busy pretending Rudy is a conservative Republican and not the stinking liberal that he is that you have to pretend away a bunch of other stuff while you're at it. Now you're pretending that the President of the United States has "nothing" to do with abortion and that it is "unreasonable too expect a POTUS to do anything" about abortion. You are wrong and intentionally so.

Let's review SOME of what each President has done for or against abortion from Reagan to Bush II:

President Ronald Reagan 1981-1989:
“My administration is dedicated to the preservation of America as a free land, and there is no cause more important for preserving that freedom than affirming the transcendent right to life of all human beings, the right without which no other rights have meaning.” -President Ronald Reagan

President George H. W. Bush 1989-1993
“Since 1973, there have been about 20 million abortions. This a tragedy of shattering proportions.”

“The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overturned.” -President George H.W. Bush

President William Clinton 1993-2001
President Bill Clinton said he has “always been pro-choice” and has “never wavered” in his “support for Roe v. Wade.” “I have believed in the rule of Roe v. Wade for 20 years since I used to teach it in law school.”

President George W. Bush 2001-Present
“The promises of our Declaration of Independence are not just for the strong, the independent, or the healthy. They are for everyone -- including unborn children. We are a society with enough compassion and wealth and love to care for both mothers and their children, to see the promise and potential in every human life.” -President George W. Bush


246 posted on 04/04/2007 2:44:23 PM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Yeah Ok - now I am a liar and delusional.

Thanks for that also.

Charming aren’t you?


247 posted on 04/04/2007 2:44:27 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When you list it out like that, it becomes rather foolish to continue accusing those who oppose Rudy Guiliani as “single-issue” folks. Seems to me those who support him only have three issues they wish to sell to others:

He’ll be tough on the terrorists (as if the other candidates running won’t be; well, I don’t know about McCain, given his backstabbing of the president on the WOT)

He’ll be a fiscal conservative (as if the other candidates running won’t be but given his stance on making taxpayers fund abortions, he doesn’t sound all that “fiscally conservative” to me)

He’s promised to appoint “strict constitutionalists” to the courts but if he believe Roe v. Wade is constitutional, I guess we can look forward to more justices like Ruth Bader Ginsburg!

Frankly, I won’t be voting for this guy. I don’t see much of a difference in domestic policy with him or any of the DemocRATS.


248 posted on 04/04/2007 2:44:45 PM PDT by Sister_T (The Axis of Idiocy: The LameStream Media, The DemocRATS and the "peaceful" anti-war moonbats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose; flashbunny

From a 2000 interview with Tim Russert:

Tim Russert: How about registration of ALL handguns?

Rudy Giuliani: Uh, you know I’m in favor of that. I’ve been on your show many times, talking about, uh, the program that the president (Clinton) talked about in his state of the union speech - I have been giving speeches about and talked about on your show for the last 10 to 15 years. Which is, I believe, is that we should treat the possession of a handgun the way we treat driving an automobile.

And therefore a person who wants to possess a handgun should pass a written test, should be able to pass a physical test in the actual use of the gun, and should have to demonstrate good moral character and a REASON to have the gun.

That those should be, essentially there should be a UNIFORM LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS that says that every state has to administer that, the way we say that we’re not going to let you drive an automobile if you’re too young, we’re not going let you drive an automobile if you had a bad record, and uh, every state has a slightly different variation of that, but every state has a uniform law that guarantees our safety. I think the two things are good analogies, and I’ve been arguing for that since at least 1980.


249 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:10 PM PDT by pissant (Rudy fans: the Oprah republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
I want a leader - who says what he means and means what he says.

You and I both know the words "strict constructionist" and "supply-sider" had never passed Rudy's lips until two months ago.

So far, he's attempted to finesse his positions on partial birth abortion and gun control, he's done the talk show circuit trumpeting his experience appointing judges as mayor until it turned out they were lefties then he suddenly had nothing to do with it and just last week he said his wife would sit in on cabinet meetings and then backed off that within a day.

Is that saying what you mean and meaning what you say?

250 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:17 PM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose
Rudy is a fiscal conservative

Name 5 other people that have been labeled "fiscal conservatives" that support government funded abortions.

251 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:23 PM PDT by shempy (EABOF in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Jake The Goose

“Yeah Ok - I’m a big liar.

Thanks for that.”

Are you?

What I said was that trying to spin rudy as being only for gun control in new york is a big lie. It is. He wants gun control on EVERY level.

Want to try to dispute that?


252 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:24 PM PDT by flashbunny (<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Just once I’d like to see the tagline, “Recovering Rudybot.”
How hard would it be for these freepers to say, “At last, I just couldn’t support him anymore!”

Come on, Rudybots. Just switch. It won’t bleed from your ears.


253 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:45 PM PDT by Graymatter (FREDeralist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
You are consistent in your nastiness!

Just like your boy Rudy. So, are you in love with me too?

254 posted on 04/04/2007 2:45:51 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus

So your version of morality is to heavily tax productive citizens, and then have the bulk of the government’s medical care budget spent on people who paid little or nothing into the system, and in many cases freely chose to pursue lifestyles that would ensure they had myriad expensive health problems? Because that’s what Medicare and Medicaid are all about.


255 posted on 04/04/2007 2:47:18 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O
You support Giuliani's nightmare vision of taxpayer-funded infanticide as a constitutional right?

Words such as macabre, grotesque, and sickening don't begin to fully describe such liberal lunacy.

Ex-prosecutor Giuliani believes the rest of us should be forced to pay for the wanton slaughter of the most innocent and helpless among us. And this doesn't bother you?

256 posted on 04/04/2007 2:47:29 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

The straight-talkin Rudy nonsense is absolute BS. He is as big a panderer as there is.


257 posted on 04/04/2007 2:47:53 PM PDT by garv (Conservatism in '08 www.draftnewt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: shempy

Oh come on - a single issue and you strip away the ability of someone to be a “fiscal conservative”

No more time for you - reason is out the window.

Good luck to you and your candidate.


258 posted on 04/04/2007 2:47:54 PM PDT by Jake The Goose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

You won’t get any objection from me to that plan. Especially if passive contraceptives were offered and not used.


259 posted on 04/04/2007 2:48:31 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
"If it would deprive someone of a constitutional right," he explained, "If that's the status of the law, yes."

As always, some only see and read what they want to see and read.

The second sentence is just as important as the first.

The status of the law is that Medicaid pays for abortion for poor women in cases of rape or incest, and when the woman's life is endangered by a physical disorder, illness, or injury.

Any candidate that tells you that he will change that status is lying to you.

But for some, that is what they look for most in a candidate, someone who will lie, who will tell them what they want to hear.

Whether it is that he will get enacted a Constitutional marriage amendment or that he will- while abortion is not only legal but a Constitutional right- defund all Medicaid abortions.

Say what you will about Giuliani, unlike almost all politicians, he respects the electorate by telling the truth. Even while turning off the knee jerk voters he would need.

Giuliani's candidacy is a unique experiment in American politics. Can an accomplished and hugely successful politician still win when telling voters the truth without pandering.

260 posted on 04/04/2007 2:48:54 PM PDT by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 461-473 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson