ping
Congress should not pass such a law. The media already has way too much power and way too little accountability.
Is Fitzgerald throwing sand in our eyes?
Since Fitzgerald knew the answer to the question he was supposed to investigate on the first day of his investigation, you have to wonder what he was doing at public expense for 3 years.
What was he investigating?
I think he should be held accountable.
Since I’m confident that Fitzy will be running as a (D) for some high elective office in the near future (largely based on his “courageous” prosecution of Libby), this is probably as good a time as any to expose his “prosecutorial philosophy” in the Libby case.
Fitzgerald should be disbarred for NOT calling a mistrial for no crime was committed and he knew it.. from the beginning..
Bump for later...
Fitzfong is a fraud and a charlatan who must be disbarred. It is long past time to put his misconduct in the spotlight and make him answer for it. btw, I have no sympathy for people who want any sort of federal “shield law” or absolute protection for journalists’ sources in sensitive cases, but in this matter Fitzfong has acted so recklessly and unethically that his misbehavior will give weight to arguments for a federal shield law.
You don’t go after journalists’ sources when you already know who the leaker was (and you’re not even interested in the “real leaker” because you know that no crime was committed) ........ Fitzfong was on a fishing expedition to try to get the WH any way he could...... he wanted to troll around journalists’ sources and records to see if he could come up with anything, and that is way over the line.
See this?
BTTT!