Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

Then you just put a clause in the contract saying..(words to the effect) that this is not a bribe, and IBM does not expect any special treatment in any future dealings.


9 posted on 04/03/2007 7:24:37 AM PDT by Valin (History takes time. It is not an instant thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Valin
Then you just put a clause in the contract saying..(words to the effect) that this is not a bribe, and IBM does not expect any special treatment in any future dealings.

It would be nice if it were that simple... however, look at it as such:

The Pentagon has been evaluating IBM's system for purchase. This implies that it is likely that they were also evaluating similar systems from other companies. Let's say XYZ Corp. has a similar system in evaluation as well.

Now comes IBM's offer of giving the government some number of computers/licenses for free. Regardless of the rationale behind the offer, if you're XYZ Corp., you're going to see this as IBM getting an unfair advantage toward a potential larger/longer-term contract.

Many of the procurement and gift rules the government works under seem asinine, but there's a reason for most of them.

11 posted on 04/03/2007 7:31:37 AM PDT by kevkrom (Tagline under construction -- please use alternate witticsims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson