Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE END OF RUDY'S BLISS (the Rudy/Judi Barbara Walters disaster)
NY POST ^ | April 3, 2007 | JOHN PODHERETZ

Posted on 04/03/2007 4:02:00 AM PDT by Liz

The Giuliani '08 juggernaut just ran head-on into Podhoretz's First and Last Law of Politics, namely: No politician seeking the nation's highest office can do as much damage to another as he can do to himself. --SNIP-- The question before us today is whether Rudy Giuliani committed a blunder of comparable proportions by consenting to a Barbara Walters request for a joint interview with him and his wife Judi - during the course of which he said, embarrassingly, that he would welcome her presence at Cabinet meetings and listen to her closely on issues relating to health care.

Until that moment, he had handled his presidential bid as perfectly as could be imagined......his four months of bliss came to an end when ABC News released the first snippets of the Walters interview last Thursday..... Walters moment only revealed that Rudy ......thought he could say something cute about his wife that really wasn't cute at all - seemed perhaps more about currying favor with her than about finding the appropriate balance between portraying a loving marriage and depicting a future presidency. Of course, what Rudy was doing with Barbara Walters was an effort....- to neutralize the damaging effect of his marital history by being open and clear and honest. He did that well.....then he muffed it.

News of the Walters interview began a 96-hour ordeal for Giuliani that included the leak of his grand-jury testimony in the case of his former police commissioner's ties to a crooked contractor - potentially his most serious liability - and the revelations that Judi Giuliani has actually been married more than twice and had worked for a medical-equipment firm that used (and thus killed) dogs.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; judith; lizhanover; rudy; twofer; twoforone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last
No candidate would go on broadcast TV with Barbara Walters without a clear-cut agenda to enhance his candidacy. The Walters interview indicated Rudy and Judi had clearly discussed her role in the US government. Rudy/Judi had been carefully coached.....and Barbara was briefed about what they wanted to discuss (a common practice).

Rudy and Judi cut to the quick, telling Barbara without hesitation that Judi would "sit in" on Cabinet meetings. Less than 24 hours later, Rudy was backtracking like crazy---denying Judi had Cabinet aspirations. Course these two are so arrogant and smug---they never figured on the backlash that ensued.

Giuliani's campaign issued a statement: "Obviously, she will not be a Cabinet member or attend most Cabinet meetings _ if any.

A Cabinet member? That's a strange thing to say. Unless Giuliani's hidden agenda was to condition Americans to Judi's presence at Cabinet meetings---clearing the way for Judi's appointment to a Cabinet position later.

Memo to Rudy: Your third wife may be the love of YOUR life but Americans have a more stringent standard to judge potential First Ladies. As for the Rudy/Judi aggressive plan to sell yourselves as a "team," Americans say, "no way."

CONCLUSION: Rudy was "for" Judi sitting in on Cabinet meetings before he was "against it"......AND he's sleeping on the couch for the forseeable future.

1 posted on 04/03/2007 4:02:02 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz

Hopefully, this is the beginning of the end of this liberal’s campaign for the conservative nomination.

Time to get behind Fred.


2 posted on 04/03/2007 4:05:43 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Attacking Judith Giuliani - bad!

Attacking Teresa Heinz-Kerry - good!

Don't believe it? Just ask any Rudy fan.

3 posted on 04/03/2007 4:09:10 AM PDT by airborne (Freedom is worth fighting for !! And I'm in a fighting mood !! HUNTER 2008 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I can’t believe he was stupid enough to repeat the Bill Clinton 2 fer BS.

So long Rudi, better men are waiting in the wings.


4 posted on 04/03/2007 4:09:10 AM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions----and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Nurse Judy, Rudys biggest ass-ette, is becoming his biggest lie-ability.


5 posted on 04/03/2007 4:13:43 AM PDT by dforest (Fighting the new liberal Conservatism. The Left foot in the GOP door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Actually Judith Guiliani came off rather well as an intelligent and sweet-tempered sort of individual. I doubt this will have any affect at all in the long run. He still leads Hillary in polls in PA, OH, NJ, CT, OR, MN, RI, FL and elsewhere. No other Republican candidate can bring that kind of clout to the table.


6 posted on 04/03/2007 4:14:21 AM PDT by writeblock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Right you are, he was for it until he realized the voters were against it. He is quoted as saying that his policies are not that much different than Clinton’s and I guess he should know.

Rudybots will go down in flames.


7 posted on 04/03/2007 4:15:24 AM PDT by stockpirate (You want real conservatives to show up at the polls this time, run real conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Yet another bad decision by Rudy.


8 posted on 04/03/2007 4:15:48 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
His admission that he would let his wife sit in, and comment on, cabinet meetings hurt him with the more conservative voter(as if his social views did not do that).

His wife's history with the company that used live dogs to demonstrate its's stapling device, killed any chances he had with the moderates and the Liberals.

Of course the Rudy lapdogs will deny it, but then they are lapdogs after all.

9 posted on 04/03/2007 4:19:44 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Tempest in a teapot. Next.


10 posted on 04/03/2007 4:19:59 AM PDT by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

“Hopefully, this is the beginning of the end of this liberal’s campaign for the conservative nomination.Time to get behind Fred.”

You should stop smoking that stuff. Rudy brings CA, OR, NJ, CT, RI, PA, OH, FL, IO, and MN to the table—all blue and purple states. What does Fred bring—aside from a single lackluster term in the Senate and no executive experience whatsoever. He couldn’t wait to return to his first love—acting.


11 posted on 04/03/2007 4:20:59 AM PDT by writeblock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

-what the heck? It sounds like Rudy and Judy are still playing house together........did they learn NOTHING from hillary’s health care debacle? Judy would do better to emulate Laura Bush than hillary rodham clinton. hillary fancied herself the health care queen....hillary considered herself co-president.......hillary aspired to a cabinet level position......even taking al’s office space (didn’t she?).....seems Judy has some lofty fantisies of herself...and Rudy does too.


12 posted on 04/03/2007 4:22:50 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writeblock

Yeah, it’s clout today; once he’s gets the nomination the Dem pimp media will kill him. His personal life is a mess, and he’s pro abortion, gun control and homosexual ‘union’ whatever that means.

Make no mistake, the MSM is FOR Hillary; they will drive this process in any way to get her the presidency. Rudy is not the answer for the GOP. He’s a liberal.


13 posted on 04/03/2007 4:25:34 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

LOL. Damn, you’re good.


14 posted on 04/03/2007 4:25:48 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Post-Neolithic

Excellent point——we have to remember Rudy has two faces: one side speaks liberal, the other side tries to speak conservative (and usually fails).


15 posted on 04/03/2007 4:28:44 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

LOL Enough! It’s not even close to official campaigning season and I am done with Judi, and it’s not entirely her fault.

Lord Hildemort ruined the way for First Ladies that would follow her. She’s like the misquote of Hobbes; “nasty, brutish and short”.

Laura Bush did the impossible; she brought up the stature and class of being an active First Lady without being a shrew, and now it seems that anyone who falls short of our most loved First Lady falls in the LH category.

LOL


16 posted on 04/03/2007 4:30:19 AM PDT by saveliberty (Prayer blizzard for Tony and Jill Snow and their family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Bitch set me up...


17 posted on 04/03/2007 4:30:45 AM PDT by Jim Noble (But that's why they play the games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Rudy asks the media to lay off his wife (his words as I recall). He should leave her off camera unless he really wants to make HER the issue.


18 posted on 04/03/2007 4:30:46 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Victory in war means winning, unless you are a democ-rat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Time to get behind Duncan.


19 posted on 04/03/2007 4:33:00 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
Tempest in a teapot. Next.

I'm sure there will be a 'next'. This is a pretty big mistake for an experienced politician to make, something I'd expect far more out of Obama. Besides, it would look endearing in his party. Republicans want women who don't try to dominate their men.

20 posted on 04/03/2007 4:33:15 AM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-415 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson