You're losing here and you could show everyone you have capacity to realize that fact.
FDT never said he was pro-choice. He said he was against (federal) government involvement in abortion.
Before Roe vs. Wade the federal government was not involved in abortion issues. It was a States rights issue. The abortionists very much want the federal government to be involved by enforcing abortion rights.
So your whole logic is twisted.
FDT was saying he's in favor of returning to the policy of non-involvement of the federal government in abortion, meaning he is favor of overturning Roe vs. Wade.
It is Roe vs. Wade that forces the federal government to sanction abortion, to the absurd point that it is funded as a public health measure.
I also believe the federal government should have no say in abortion issues and I am pro-life.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n12_v46/ai_15544266/pg_2
I guess National Review lied as well back in 1994.
"I believe that government should not interfere with individual convictions and actions in this area." -- Fred Thompson
That means that an individual should have the choice to abort or not abort according to her own convictions, and free from interference from any level of government.
Pro-choice because it disallows for the government making abortion illegal.
If you think this is bad, you should read his pro illegal immigration posts on immigration threads.