Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No U-Turns: Goldwater and Reagan were important leaders, but they’re not models for the future.
The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette ^ | April 1, 2007 | David Brooks

Posted on 04/01/2007 1:45:19 PM PDT by quidnunc

There is an argument floating around Republican circles that in order to win again, the GOP has to reconnect with the truths of its Goldwater-Reagan glory days. It has to once again be the minimal-government party, the maximal-freedom party, the party of rugged individualism, and states’ rights.

This is folly. It’s the wrong diagnosis of current realities and so the wrong prescription for the future.

Back in the 1970s, when Reaganism became popular, top tax rates were in the 70s, growth was stagnant and inflation was high. Federal regulation stifled competition. Government welfare policies enabled a culture of dependency. Socialism was still a coherent creed, and many believed the capitalist world was headed toward a Swedish welfare model.

In short, in the 1970s, normal, nonideological people were right to think that their future prospects might be dimmed by a stultifying state. People were right to believe that government was undermining personal responsibility. People were right to have what Tyler Cowen, in a brilliant essay in Cato Unbound, calls the “liberty vs. power” paradigm burned into their minds — the idea that big government means less personal liberty.

But today, many of those old problems have receded or been addressed. Today the big threats to people’s future prospects come from complex, decentralized phenomena: Islamic extremism, failed states, global competition, global warming, nuclear proliferation, a skills-based economy, economic and social segmentation.

Normal, nonideological people are less concerned about the threat to their freedom from an overweening state than from the threats posed by these amorphous yet pervasive phenomena. The “liberty vs. power” paradigm is less germane. …

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at nwanews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Yippy, the great defenders of the status quo speak again. I'm really impressed. The "if it's screwed-up, apply more of the same" method of government has been working real great so far.

A salesman approached a man on the street with a special offer on mosquito repellent. The man bought some, took it home and used it.

By chance a few weeks latter the man encountered the salesman on the street, "Hey! that mosquito repellent you sold me doesn't work. There are more mosquitoes at my home that I ever had!"

The salesman replied, "You must need some more."

41 posted on 04/01/2007 2:42:17 PM PDT by etlib (No creature without tentacles has ever developed true intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

I don't want nor need a "FATHER FIGURE." I was someone who can and will be tough on our enemies. Period. I don't care if he's rude, polite, married four times or goes to Church on Sundays.


42 posted on 04/01/2007 2:43:06 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Sorry. I'll take liberty over big government any day.

That statement means your most likely a man, or an unusual woman.

Generally, women are more willing than men to trade freedom away in return for the preceived security of government.

43 posted on 04/01/2007 2:44:44 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Sorry. I'll take liberty over big government any day.

But many 'conservatives' won't. Look even here. The cheering for Giuliani, Romney, Hunter, etc. All big government hacks in their own way on their own issues, be it social, foreign policy, etc. And the one actual conservative in the bunch (Rep. Paul) is ignored by the general media for more than a few reasons, namely of which he won't support the spend and nonsense that Republicans and Democrats generate and the media loves

44 posted on 04/01/2007 2:46:33 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
"global warming"

the slimes' house conservative reveals his stripes and they slant leftward, again.

45 posted on 04/01/2007 2:48:39 PM PDT by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

The misconception isn't at all limited to socialists - unless you don't count those "conservatives" who seem to have forgotten what limited government actually means and what Goldwater/Reagan really stood for.


46 posted on 04/01/2007 2:48:48 PM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Ignoring reality will just continue and accelerate the GOP's rush to irrelevance, permanent and insignificant minority status, almost irrevocably handing over to the Democrats the country entirely.

If the idiots legislate that way already under the auspices of 'compassionate conservatism' does it really matter what letter they have by their name? No. I'll not cast a vote for my representation just so someone's 'team' stays or gains power.

47 posted on 04/01/2007 2:49:53 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Too true.

The conservative movement died the minute they decided they preferred Statist security over liberty.

48 posted on 04/01/2007 2:50:41 PM PDT by Wormwood (Future Former Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rob777

Unfortunately the socialist left and sociocon/neocon/theocon right have no desire to shrink Big Brother - just in remaking it in their own image.

Death to Goldstein...


49 posted on 04/01/2007 2:53:57 PM PDT by mgstarr (KZ-6090 Smith W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

There are too many "Richard Nixon" type conservatives on here...


50 posted on 04/01/2007 2:57:01 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (An angry American. Mad as hell and cant take it anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rob777
With the advent of "Big Government Conservatism", we have both side of the political divide seeking to expand the role of the federal leviathan.

That, my friend, deserves to be repeated.

I agree without reservation.

51 posted on 04/01/2007 2:59:55 PM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
There are too many "Richard Nixon" type conservatives on here...

Really? I thought there were too many Pat Robertson types. Live and learn.

52 posted on 04/01/2007 3:02:06 PM PDT by Wormwood (Future Former Freeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rob777
I would certainly agree that the concept of property rights is something we should keep. Maybe I should of said that I didnt know what all of the changes would be though what you have mentioned is not one of the changes.
53 posted on 04/01/2007 3:02:26 PM PDT by bilhosty (Rudy in '08, Jindal in '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #54 Removed by Moderator

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

Comment #60 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson