"Maybe Ware was drunk; that would be consistent with his own description of how he spends his time in Baghdad. But he is an extreme manifestation of an all too common phenomenon--the journalist as advocate rather than neutral observer. One of the many problems with a reporter who becomes an activist, agitating for a particular side of a public issue, is that he loses any hope of objectivity. Having publicly committed himself to the proposition that everything that happens in Iraq is a disaster, having publicly ridiculed those who pointed to optimistic developments, how can anyone trust that Ware's future reporting is giving us anything like the straight story from Iraq? And what does his conduct say about his employer, CNN? How much confidence can we have in their reporting from Baghdad, or anywhere else?"
Yes the same CNN that worked with Saddam before we invaded in exchange for office space at his palace.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1723977/posts
2001 Document: Saddam Regime Gives CNN Priority For News Coverage (Translation)
Pentagon FMSO website | October 22 2006 | jveritas
Another great piece of work by jveritas, I missed that, thanks for posting.
CNN truly lives up to it's reputation of biased reporting and catering to the commie left.
Ah oldies but goodies :)