Don't get into such a huffy (conniption).
As the comment stated, ETA does destroy things--but they also tend to send warnings.
The hijackers on September 11, the Bali bombers, the London bombers, and the Madrid train bombers, sent no warning that they were going to bomb a target.
This isn't typing that ETA isn't bad--which is apparently what you think it is.
It is merely suggesting the that the Madrid bombings did not fit ETA's profile, and did fit the profile of islamofascists.
You, of course, do not have to agree--which you obviously don't.
iopscusa, all of you are welcome. I think the Anglosphere should, at least, have access to an alternative version about what happened on 3/11. I thank also FreeRepublic.com for giving me such opportunity.
Jedi Master Pikachu,
ETA sent no warning when its men
targeted Aznar, then opposition leader, in 1995.(That's Madrid, not Baghdad)
ETA sent no warning when a car bomb killed
five navy workers in Vallecas
ETA sent no warning when -Basque- journalist
Lopez de Lacalle was gunned down near his home in the Basque Country on May 7th, 2000.
ETA sent not warning either when in 1991
targeted the wifes and children of Civil Guards, in its attack against their headquarters in Vic.
Jedi Master Pikachu, ETA follows no rules and does what it is necessary to win.
In the Madrid train bombings,
there were several warnings that something was going to happen, unlike 9/11; among others, a boycott by ETA against Spanish National Railways. You are talking about the Madrid train bombers, I don't know who they are. If it was ETA, then they sent a warning, directed to their followers, but a warning.
This isn't typing that ETA isn't bad--which is apparently what you think it is.
No, you are telling ETA may follow rules, which is false.
It is merely suggesting the opinion that the Madrid bombings did not fit ETA's profile, and did fit the profile of islamofascists.
You, of course, do not have to agree--which you obviously don't.
Titadyne was used by ETA, 3/11 fits into ETA profile. On Christmas Eve 2003 a similar attack was inteded against Chamartin Station by ETA, with bombs disguised as luggage in an Intercity train coming from the Basque Country, 3/11 fits into ETA profile; 3/11 had political ends, it fits into ETA profile...
BTW, does 3/11 fit into an Islamic attack? Luis del Pino wrote almost two years ago an article on it, whose translation is
here. It is a bit outdated, but worth reading it.
It is not my fault that the international public opinion has been deceived with biased data, or simply hidding important information. I am trying to correct that. I can tell you that performing an objective study on the 3/11 attack, no Islamic signs are found, I am afraid Islamism was added by security services and the media.