[HitmanLV]

No, it;s not on point. Typing out a fact of the 1984 election results isn't an argument, it's just a fact.

Like I said earlier, someone can win or lose an election by any margin and be wildly unpopular or popular at a later date. One doesn't have much to do with the other, necessarily.

[ziravan]

"Like I said earlier, someone can win or lose an election by any margin and be wildly unpopular or popular at a later date. One doesn't have much to do with the other, necessarily."

The difference is deemed 'wildly popular' according to which source? One doesn't have to do with the other BECAUSE the MSM doesn't recognize the actual opinions of the people of this great nation.

Sorry, I trust the opinions of the actual voting electorate over the drive-by. They can anoint anybody they like as 'wildly popular'. Thank God, THEY do not determine the outcomes of elections, at least not directly.

At the moment, the only date that is on point is November 4, 2008. If a conservative wins THAT date, and sticks to his guns, then 2012 will be a cake-walk.

No matter what the MSM says about him.

~faith.