Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi King opens Arab summit with attack on US deployment in Iraq as illegitimate foreign occupation
Debka ^ | March 28, 2007 | Debka

Posted on 03/28/2007 7:59:49 PM PDT by Khepri

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Khepri

Elections and Surrender Resolutions have consequences...

The Saudi's are positioning themselves to survive the coming slaughter, after the American Surrender....

They see the writing on the wall, and know the history of what happens after the American Abandonment....



21 posted on 03/29/2007 5:50:01 AM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepri

> END MIDDLEEAST OIL DEPENDENCY NOW

Absolutely. Drill, solar, wind, nuclear, bio, geothermal-- heck, wire those stupid exercise bikes at 24 hour fitness-- I don't care. These people were never our friends, and we need to be able to tell them (and Chavez) that we don't need their stinking black goo.


22 posted on 03/29/2007 8:21:22 AM PDT by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; Fedora; ..
Not as the headline sez:
Saudi FM Saud al Faisal set limits on Arab willingness to help US Middle East efforts. The prince said: "What we have the power to do in the Arab world, we think we have done." He went on to say: "If Israel refuses (Ed. the Saudi peace plan), that means it doesn’t want peace and places everything back into the hands of fate - not in the hands of the peacemakers but in the hands of the 'lords of war.'"
Probably a waste of time, this is a DEBKAfile story. However, even if Faisal had said that the US is an occupier, it shows that the Saudis are losing control and influence over the Sunni terrorist groups, who are now leaving in droves because cooperation with the US is the best way to keep from getting killed by either al-Qaeda or Iran's proxies.
23 posted on 03/29/2007 10:45:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

US Military Foils Insurgent Attack
Bell South.net | 3-27-2007 | AP
Posted on 03/27/2007 4:34:00 PM EDT by blam
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1807671/posts


24 posted on 03/29/2007 10:46:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
This just in;

Saudi King Abdullah has just committed his military and all the Kingdom's money to replace the efforts of the "illegitimate" US occupation force in Iraq. We, as Americans, applaud the Kings unselfishness in committing his country in coming to aid to their brothers in Iraq.

In other news:

US forces will be leaving Iraq tomorrow, to allow the sons of Mohamed time to finally beat the ever loving shit out of each other and celebrate by selling oil really cheap so they can buy allot of weapons from other countries in order to express their own unique brand of love and caringness for each other as expressed in the Koran.

Allah Aka-bar, dude!
25 posted on 03/29/2007 3:40:45 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
You mean THIS Abdullah?

Get a room you two!

26 posted on 03/29/2007 3:56:42 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
END MIDDLEEAST OIL DEPENDENCY NOW

Why? Mideast oil is great. The problem is, it is currently controlled by Arabs. More specifically, the Ibn Saud gang, who FDR and Churchill gave control of the oil supply to in the first place. Why don't we just remove that control, and have a joint Allied control of all oil resources on the Peninsula? The U.S. and Britain could achieve that in less than a week. Oil is too important a resource to be trusted to violent Arab savages.

27 posted on 03/29/2007 3:59:27 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
If only Saudi Royalty were interested in other things besides power, money and two-facing the United States.


28 posted on 03/29/2007 3:59:47 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
Our ally in the war on terror, The Saudi leadership.

Yep, just like out other wonderful ally Pakistan. You know, the ones who are hiding Bin Laden from us.

29 posted on 03/29/2007 4:00:34 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Why don't we just remove that control, and have a joint Allied control of all oil resources on the Peninsula? The U.S. and Britain could achieve that in less than a week. Oil is too important a resource to be trusted to violent Arab savages.

I agree 100%. The middle east should have remained completely under control of the US and Britain as a protectorate after World War II. Providing 7th century minds with trillions$$$ has had unintended consequences; our honest mistake was thinking commerce would civilize them.

30 posted on 03/29/2007 4:07:48 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo (5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Khepri; SunkenCiv
Go ahead, King Abdullah. I never thought you were on our side in this war. The Israelis cleaned the clock of your ancestors, when they were known as "Amalekites," and if they do it again, most of us would rather buy your oil from them anyway.

Satan's Chosen People?

31 posted on 03/29/2007 4:11:28 PM PDT by Berosus ("There is no beauty like Jerusalem, no wealth like Rome, no depravity like Arabia."--the Talmud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berosus

:') What you said.

The real struggle has been between the House of Saud and the Iranian mullahcracy, with various socialist sideshows (like the House of Asad, Saddam Hussein, Mubarek), the Hashemite monarchy (which does pretty well for a landlocked country with no allies other than perhaps Israel), and the (for now) Republic of Turkey trying to maneuver around 'em. The House of Saud is in a very precarious position right now, and although I've said it plenty of times before, I don't think civil war in Saudi Arabia is very far off. Saudi influence has been in rapid decline for a year or more; the Hizzie war in Lebanon was the first strong sign that they were losing their grip.


32 posted on 03/29/2007 10:06:29 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (I last updated my profile on Saturday, March 24, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson