Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: puppypusher; sionnsar
Air flows and designs have to be similar if the two aircraft are to be able to fly efficiently.

But having said that, it's more true that they "overbuilt" this to be bigger than the C-5, rather than "just" support the USSR-clone of the Space Shuttle.

Propaganda was the source of much of the Soviet pressure in military spending: typically, they'd either make "one of" a bigger or more capable US machine, or many tens times a replacement for the more capable US machine. They'd make one plane (their SST) before the Concorde and Boeing supersonic transport, but it would not be as successful. Or they'd make several thousand MORE tanks, but each tank was less capable - but delivered faster, than the US M-1.
318 posted on 03/29/2007 5:36:28 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Thanks for the added info about the US C-5 and the Russian plane. And thanks to your son for his service to our country.


392 posted on 03/29/2007 3:31:27 PM PDT by Kathy in Alaska (~ God Bless and Protect Our Brave Protectors of Freedom~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson