Posted on 03/28/2007 2:28:52 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
WASHINGTON (AP) -
President Bush and the Democratic-controlled Congress lurched toward a veto showdown over Iraq on Wednesday, the commander in chief demanding a replenishment of war funding with no strings and Speaker Nancy Pelosi counseling him, "Calm down, take a breath."
Bush said imposition of a"specific and random date of withdrawal would be disastrous" for U.S. troops in Iraq and he predicted that lawmakers would take the blame if the money ran short.
"The clock is ticking for our troops in the field," he said. "If Congress fails to pass a bill to fund our troops on the front lines, the American people will know who to hold responsible."
Bush spoke as the Senate moved toward passage of legislation that would require the beginning of a troop withdrawal within 120 days, and would set a goal of March 31, 2008, for its completion.
The House approved a more sweeping measure last week, including a mandatory withdrawal deadline for nearly all combat troops of Sept. 1, 2008.
Both bills would provide more than $90 billion to sustain military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
After passage, the next step would be a House-Senate compromise measure almost certain to include conditions that Bush has said he finds objectionable, and the president's remarks seemed designed to lay the political groundwork for a veto showdown with the new Democratic majority later this spring.
Confidently predicting his veto would be sustained in Congress, he said, "Funding for our forces in Iraq will begin to run out in mid-April. Members of Congress need to stop making political statements, and start providing vital funds for our troops. They need to get that bill to my desk so I can sign it into law."
One key Democrat with longtime ties to the Pentagon, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., said Bush was exaggerating, and he estimated the real deadline for a fresh infusion of funds was June 1.
Gordon Adams, a former Clinton administration official specializing in defense issues, said the Pentagon has authority to transfer existing funds between accounts. "So into June, while it's painful, it's possible" for the military to maintain operations, he said.
Democratic leaders, determined to force Bush to change course in Iraq, also disputed his contention that Congress would be to blame for any funding difficulties in a war they have vowed to end.
"Why doesn't he get real with what's going on with the world?" said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "We're not holding up funding in Iraq and he knows that. Why doesn't he deal with the real issues facing the American people?"
Pelosi responded to Bush with a blend of conciliation and challenge.
"On this very important matter, I would extend a hand of friendship to the president, just to say to him, 'Calm down, take a breath," she said. "There's new Congress in town. We accept your constitutional role. We want you to accept ours."
Democrats took control of Congress in January after elections framed by voter dissatisfaction over a war that has now claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops and cost more than $350 billion.
"This war must end. The American people have lost faith in the president's conduct of the war. Let's see how we can work together," added Pelosi, D-Calif.
Whatever the outcome, the confrontation bore similarities to a veto fight of a dozen years ago. At the time, a new, Republican-controlled Congress promised steep spending cutbacks to balance the budget, and a politically weakened president of the other party refused to go along.
A pair of government shutdowns ensued - including one that lasted 21 days - and Republicans bore the brunt of the public's unhappiness. In the end, the new GOP majority surrendered, and Bill Clinton exploited the episode to help rehabilitate his standing with the voters.
Apart from the Iraq provisions, the Senate legislation includes about $20 billion in domestic spending that Bush did not ask for. Republicans readied an attempt to strip out much of it, and Bush listed it as among the bill's objectionable features.
"Here's the bottom line: The House and Senate bills have too much pork," he said. He got a laugh at lawmakers' expense when he said $3.5 million was included "for visitors to tour the Capitol and see for themselves how Congress works." The funds are for a new underground Capitol visitor center, over-budget and still incomplete years after its initial target date.
Congress seemed to have little appetite for curbing spending, though.
A few hours after the president spoke, the Senate voted 75-22 in favor of a proposal by Ron Wyden, D-Ore. to extend payments that rural counties receive to make up for the loss of revenue from federal lands. The cost was about $5 billion, to be financed by increased penalties for taxpayers who provide false information to the IRS.
The Senate bill also contains previously passed legislation to raise the minimum wage by $2.10 in three steps, along with $12 billion in tax cuts. That was well above the $8.3 billion in tax cuts that cleared the Senate earlier this year - a level that Pelosi and House Democrats have deemed excessive.
--
veto ping
Those aren't strings. They are bribes. They are the politicians way of saying we will sacrifice our 'principled stance against this war' in exchange for some money.
"...and Speaker Nancy Pelosi counseling him, "Calm down, take a breath.""
B!tch
about 5 years too late I'm athinkin'.
Absolutely!!!
"If Congress fails to pass a bill to fund our troops on the front lines, the American people will know who to hold responsible."
Alrighty now, Bushie.
"On this very important matter, I would extend a hand of friendship to the president, just to say to him, 'Calm down, take a breath," she said. "There's new Congress in town. We accept your constitutional role. We want you to accept ours."
OMG!!! What a raging B I T C H !!!!!!!!!! W have more than one war going on!
Probably not possible due to McNamara's method of separately funding Defense Contracts, but who knows. This would be the best solution. To continue the funding for the most important functions of the Military and letting long term acquisitions be put on hold until the problem is resolved.
Bush will blink first.
yep and they have seats to protect not Bush, so bring it on
Go Dubya
This is something I`ve yet to hear from the Treasoncrats, or maybe they just don`t care?
All I ever hear from them is "withdraw withdraw withdraw, retreat retreat" but none of them talk about the result.
"Sorry men, we gotta pull back. Nancys orders."
"Ooooo! Victory!"
"Thank you Nancy for letting millions die just so you can massage your psychotic ego."
And make sure that the programs that are shut down are housed in primarily DEMOCRATIC districts.
Time to play hardball.
}:-)4
That might happen accidentally.
He's used hundreds of signing statements in place of line-item vetos and no one has ever been able to challenge him on it. Besides, the senate withdrawal nonsense is non-binding, anyway. So, who cares?
I want the money right now for our troops. This should not be delayed.
Pelosi is America's new sweetheart. After all. Her party was voted in to lead this country. Now pay the price America.
"Oooo! We don`t care about millions of babies being butchered every year so why should we care about millions of adults? We Treasoncrats say withdraw and let the holocaust deniers have their way!"
"Thank you Nancy, you are all heart!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.