....but there's "victory" in having Hillary running things for 8 years? Making Supreme nominations for 8 years? Go ahead oppose the GOP candidate and see how things are in 2016.
I will push for and support whatever Republican candidate I will in the primaries......but I'll never attempt to help Hillary into the big House by opposing the GOP nominee in the general, whoever it will be.
Even if it's Rudy.
Even if it's McCain.
Even if it's Romney.
....or any of the other "maybe"/"might be"/"thinkin' about it" candidates.
---"...but there's "victory" in having Hillary running things for 8 years? Making Supreme nominations for 8 years? Go ahead oppose the GOP candidate and see how things are in 2016..."---
What country do you live in where Presidents serve eight year terms?
Rudy's Supreme Court nominees, by the way, would be no better for Social Conservatives. anyone suggesting otherwise is full of crap.
---"...but there's "victory" in having Hillary running things for 8 years? Making Supreme nominations for 8 years? Go ahead oppose the GOP candidate and see how things are in 2016..."---
What country do you live in where Presidents serve eight year terms?
Rudy's Supreme Court nominees, by the way, would be no better for Social Conservatives. anyone suggesting otherwise is full of crap.
It'll never happen. A stronger, more conservative GOP Congress will emerge in 2010. People hate one-party rule, and Dems aren't immune from this either. See 1994.