Using the term "All or Nothings" to describe people who are opposed to a candidate who is a credible conservative on no more than 20-25% of the issues is one of the most idiotic things I've ever seen here on this site.
Eating our own, how? The primaries haven't even started yet.
All in the name of teaching the Republicans a lesson.
Yeah we should obediently accept a liberal Republican. God you people are such sheep.
Our own? How this character is allowed to put an "R" behind his name is beyond me.
"Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine." - Rudy Giuliani
Giuliani
Clinton
Dem Platform
GOP Platform
Abortion on Demand
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Partial Birth Abortion
Supports Opposed NY ban
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Roe v. Wade
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Taxpayer Funded Abortions
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Federal Marriage Amendment
Opposes
Opposes
Opposes Defined at state level
Supports
Gay Domestic Partnership/ Civil Unions
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Openly Gay Military
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Defense of Marriage Act
Opposes
Opposes
Opposes
Supports
Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Special Path to Citizenship for Illegal Aliens
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Tough Penalties for Employers of Illegal Aliens
Opposes
Opposes
Opposes
Supports
Sanctuary Cities/ Ignoring Immigration Law
Supports
Supports
Supports
Opposes
Protecting 2nd Amendment
Opposes
Opposes
Opposes Supports bans
Supports
Confiscating Guns
Supports Confiscated as mayor. Even bragged.
Supports
Supports Supports bans
Opposes
'Assault' Weapons Ban
Supports
Supports
Supports
Frivolous Lawsuits Against Gun Makers
Supports Filed One Himself
Supports
Opposes
Gun Registration/Licenses
Supports
Supports
Opposes
War in Afghanistan
Supports
Supports Voted for it
Supports
Supports
War in Iraq
Supports
Supports Voted for it
Supports Weak support
Supports
Patriot Act
Supports
Supports Voted for it 2001 & 2006
Opposes
Supports
Angry archivists and historians denounced the unprecedented hijacking of public property to private hands. Tom Connors, of the Society of American Archivists, said the transfer seemed part of a movement to "create barriers to the American citizen's right to know what their governments are doing."
The families of the police and fire rescuers who died in the attack balked at Giuliani's plan to take up to a year to dole out the money, with his new organization billing $2.2 million in anticipated administrative expenses (including six-figure salaries for friends he appointed as officers). The families argued that the fire union had far more quickly distributed $111 million with an estimated administrative cost of just $30,000.
Under embarrassing pressure from the victims' families, unions and state Attorney General Elliot Spitzer, Giuliani backed down. He promised to distribute the money within 60 days and fund his overhead from new donations. The families of the deceased rescuers, the real heroes of the September 11 attacks, received a one-time benefit of about $230,000 each from the Giuliani-privatized fund in 2002. That year, the former mayor earned some $8 million in speaking fees alone, more than $650,000 per month.
New York conveniently forgot the 1996 federal ban on sanctuary laws until a gang of five Mexicansfour of them illegalabducted and brutally raped a 42-year-old mother of two near some railroad tracks in Queens. The NYPD had already arrested three of the illegal aliens numerous times for such crimes as assault, attempted robbery, criminal trespass, illegal gun possession, and drug offenses. The department had never notified the INS.
On the issues: Liberal Party endorsement of Giuliani
National Review: Rockefeller quote
New York Observer: Reagan Republican quote
New York Observer: Republican convention quote
New York Observer: Goldwater quote