Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
"What I would do is make clear to him that he's not going to have nuclear weapons. That's not an option. Containment may have worked with the Soviets, but as far as I can recall, the Soviets weren't planning to come here and kill us. They didn't blow up the World Trade Center twice. We've got a different kind of enemy here. Ahmadinejad has to be clear that we're not going to let him move to the stage where he can have nuclear weapons."

Now, if we could just get G.W. Bush to say as much.

Or any _other_ of the candidates...

Honestly, for all the Rudy-haters out there? What is he saying wrong?

What stronger statement could a candidate (conservative or otherwise) possibly make?

This man is presidential material. Who else out there is as much?

- John

59 posted on 03/27/2007 9:43:58 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fishrrman

I suspect Rudy's great sin to some of these people is that he might actually win. Some of our brethren don't want to win. They just want to go off to a corner and snipe. After all, it's so much easier, and more gratifying to certain kinds of warped egos. They resent anyone who even reminds them that victory is an option.


64 posted on 03/27/2007 9:48:34 PM PDT by California Patriot ("That's not Charley the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson