To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
That's very close to my own philosophy, which is why I at times describe myself as a "small r" republican (and once, bizarrely considering your comment, a "neo-Catonian".. Cicero talked too much). I'm also a "big R" Republican, but that only describes party affiliation.
The libertarian movement itself is made up of both anarcho-capitalists, who advocate a free-market system with no government (which I believe is impossible to sustain in the long run), and those who advocate a strict, limited constitutional government which is only involved in protecting liberty and enforcing contracts. My view of libertarianism is that it's an idealistic philosophy that needs to be tempered with a healthy dose of realism in order to be an effective governing philosophy.
Generally speaking, I default to the libertarian position on most issues unless I'm convinced that government intervention is needed in order to preserve liberty in society as a whole and in the long run. This, of course, causes me to take positions that would cause many card-carrying Libertarians to label me a "statist", though, to me, it just means I'm reasonable.
45 posted on
03/28/2007 8:19:09 AM PDT by
The Pack Knight
(A fine is a tax on doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.)
To: The Pack Knight
Yes, that all sounds about where I'm at, too.
46 posted on
03/28/2007 10:12:04 AM PDT by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(A sense of humour is a sign of intelligence. Which is why liberals are so humourless.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson