Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy Flexes Muscles in Persian Gulf
AP via SFGate ^ | 3/27/7 | JAMES CALDERWOOD and JIM KRANE

Posted on 03/27/2007 12:49:52 PM PDT by SmithL

ABOARD THE USS JOHN C. STENNIS, (AP) -- American warplanes screamed off two aircraft carriers Tuesday as the U.S. Navy staged its largest show of force in the Persian Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, launching a mammoth exercise meant as a message to the Iranians.

The maneuvers with 15 warships and more than 100 aircraft were sure to heighten tensions with Iran, which has frequently condemned the U.S. military presence off its coast and is in a faceoff with the West over its nuclear program and its capture of a British naval team.

While they would not say when the war games were planned, U.S. commanders insisted the exercises were not a direct response to Friday's seizure of the 15 British sailors and marines, but they also made clear that the flexing of the Navy's military might was intended as a warning.

"If there is strong presence, then it sends a clear message that you better be careful about trying to intimidate others," said Capt. Bradley Johanson, commander of the Stennis.

"Iran has adopted a very escalatory posture with the things that they have done," he added.

The exercises began four days after Iranian forces detained the 15 Britons for allegedly being in Iranian territorial waters near the northern end of the Gulf. U.S. and British officials insist the team was properly searching cargo vessels inside Iraqi waters.

F/A-18 fighter jets roared off the Stennis' flight deck all day, mounting a dozen rapid-fire training sorties against imaginary enemy ships and aircraft. A second task force with the carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower also took part in the drills.

"These maneuvers demonstrate our flexibility and capability to respond to threats to maritime security," said Navy Lt. John Perkins, 32, of Louisville, Ky., as the Stennis cruised...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bombirannow; iran; navair; usseisenhower; ussstennis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: zarf

It is not the Navy who won't budge but the anti war congressmen & Senators who won't let them


21 posted on 03/27/2007 12:59:20 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zarf

My cousin is on that fleet. She doesn't put up with any kind of %$#^ on land and she sure won't out there.


22 posted on 03/27/2007 1:00:23 PM PDT by RightWhale (Treaty rules;commerce droolz; Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
"....It is not the Navy who won't budge but the anti war congressmen & Senators who won't let them..."

Respectfully disagree. The Prez still calls the shots. One incident is all it will take. Maybe not.

23 posted on 03/27/2007 1:01:35 PM PDT by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Sadly you are probably right. They don't have to beat the Navy, few in the world can. They just have to hit on big ship and sink her and the war is over.


24 posted on 03/27/2007 1:02:08 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Didn't our Navy sink Iran's Navy in 1988?


25 posted on 03/27/2007 1:02:35 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Revvin up mah engines, shiftin' into overdrive... (dah dah dah-dah)


26 posted on 03/27/2007 1:02:44 PM PDT by ichabod1 ("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
"....They just have to hit on big ship and sink her and the war is over....."

Sorry, my friend...you (and Zarf) are wrong. It would be the beginning of the war....then the end, at our choice of time and place.

27 posted on 03/27/2007 1:04:03 PM PDT by Victor (If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Then we'll be victims.


28 posted on 03/27/2007 1:04:43 PM PDT by ichabod1 ("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: zarf

"We are not a superpower."

What the hell are you talking about?


29 posted on 03/27/2007 1:06:15 PM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Victor

In a rational world, it would be the beggining of the end of Iran, as the next step we would be sending in the B-52's with Slim Pickin's at the controls. Instant parking lot.

In the new metrosexual US, Congress would demand we pull out and then try to cut the funds. And many people would support them.


30 posted on 03/27/2007 1:06:49 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zarf
An entire navy can't and won't budge the Iranians. Road side bombs have claimed the will of our Congress.

Iraq and Iran are two entirely different military equations.

Iraq is ours to protect and feed. We have thousands of troops there. We conquered it, and are trying to make it into a viable modern nations. Rightly or wrongly - that is our mission now.

Iran is not ours to protect and feed. We can launch devastating destruction upon that nation almost at will. Roadside bombs are not in the equation. Our Navy can sink the entire Iranian Navy in a matter of days. Our Air Force and inflict pain on the Iranian infrastructure that will paralyze the nation in a matter of weeks.

Yours is an apples versus oranges argument.

31 posted on 03/27/2007 1:07:20 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

.......BITCHEN......!


32 posted on 03/27/2007 1:08:38 PM PDT by PEACE ENFORCER (Liberals; People That are So Open minded Their Brains Have Fallen Out !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
Sink one of those ships and the Iranians have won the war.

I see your ate your Defeatist Flakes for breakfast today.

33 posted on 03/27/2007 1:09:29 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

"I see your ate your Defeatist Flakes for breakfast today."

With a side order of cheese and wine...and FRENCH fries.


34 posted on 03/27/2007 1:12:43 PM PDT by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

WE HAVE A WINNNAAHHH!

YOU have correctly assessed the "toothless" comment.

Everyone else is crashing on zarf for saying it, but YOU have nailed the true villain to the tree: a gutless Congress.

In point of fact, we have the most powerful military force and the most admirable troops on the planet...

BUT...

...all of that means exactly ZERO if Congress won't back them up.

Unless our Congress acts like the legislative branch of a true superpower, we are not, in fact, a superpower. We are nothing more than the paper tiger that Bejing has always accused us of being.

That does not slander our men and women in uniform, nor does it discount the power of our implements of war.

It simply emphasizes that our superpower status relies upon these three supports: manpower, technological power, and political power.

Neutralize any one of those supports and we cease to be a superpower.

Because our Congress is the dominant body through which our national political power is implemented, the "political power" support for our superpower status is, arguably, neutralized.

Friends, we've got a whole lot of voting to do to fix this, and there's no easy way out, nor is there any short-term solution. We're a team in a rebuilding phase, and there will likely be some distasteful losses before we get back to superpower condition, again.

That's just the way it is.

I pray that each of you is doing the most you can to be part of the solution.


35 posted on 03/27/2007 1:15:55 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Total domination over all kingdoms under heaven will be given to the saints of YHVH. -- Daniel 7:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Gee, maybe this exercise will help the Iranian mullahs read up on the Geneva Convention. Think we'll be hearing less about interrogations and spy trials for uniformed British forces.


36 posted on 03/27/2007 1:17:46 PM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The maneuvers with 15 warships and more than 100 aircraft were sure to heighten tensions with Iran, which has frequently condemned the U.S. military presence off its coast and is in a faceoff with the West over its nuclear program and its capture of a British naval team.

Is this supposed to be news or "analysis"?

Either way, it is nonsense. The authors are reading the tired old "Blame America First" script that the news media has followed since the start of the Cold War.

Capturing 15 British sailors and marines heightened tensions in the region, which is undoubtedly why the Iranians did it.

37 posted on 03/27/2007 1:23:57 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

"Ours is a toothless navy."

That is the most stupid thing I have read lately. I am certain that being attacked by the U.S. Navy is NOT the equivalent of being bitten by something toothless.


38 posted on 03/27/2007 1:32:46 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (I have the right to offend. You can take offense or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
Didn't our Navy sink Iran's Navy in 1988?

Three Harpoons and 2 1000lb bombs can really f$%k up your day.

39 posted on 03/27/2007 1:35:54 PM PDT by gura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

Nice post.


40 posted on 03/27/2007 1:36:06 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock. - Will Rodgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson