1 posted on
03/27/2007 6:39:50 AM PDT by
veronica
To: veronica
But he was also a supporter of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill, opposed by most conservatives. So, veronica - do you find Fred supporting McCain-Feingold to be a big deal?
2 posted on
03/27/2007 6:42:37 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Duncan Hunter 08)
To: veronica
I'd love to see him get into the Race.
At least we'd have another Conservative to choose from instead of another Liberal in Conservative clothing.
3 posted on
03/27/2007 6:44:06 AM PDT by
Leatherneck_MT
(Duncan Hunter in 2008)
To: veronica
Thompson has already stated that MCCain-Feingold has been a failure, and would not do it again. Rudy Giuliani also supported McCain-Feingold.
9 posted on
03/27/2007 6:49:28 AM PDT by
TommyDale
("Rudy can win the War on Terror!" Perhaps, but for whose side?)
To: veronica
The Times exists to elect Hillary.
12 posted on
03/27/2007 6:50:33 AM PDT by
popdonnelly
(Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
To: veronica
Next we'll condemn Thompson because he had the utter gall -- the audacity! -- to ask if there were any tape recording in the Oval Office . . .
History, so cool and not so far away.
Thompson in the race will raise the level of the discourse, if nothing else.
But with all the conservatives, I like to play the game, "Where were they in July 2001?" Rudy was on his way out with a "Thank you, very much, but let the doorknob hit you in the *ss." and McCain was in the middle of a Recall Election (which wasn't a sure-thing for him).
TS
13 posted on
03/27/2007 6:52:54 AM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: veronica
some conservative bloggers — including one on Evangelicals for Mitt, a Web site promoting Mr. Romney’s campaign — have cited news articles from 1994 in which Mr. Thompson was described as “pro-choice” as evidence that his position has not been consistent. On their tippy toes reaching.
To: veronica
A former trial lawyer
hmmmmmm
Isn't there another a former trial lawyer in the race who gets skewered regularly on FR?
17 posted on
03/27/2007 6:55:40 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: veronica
Is that feeeear I smeel coming from you Rudybots? [sniff, sniff] Yep, is shore is!
29 posted on
03/27/2007 7:30:04 AM PDT by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: veronica
Notice they describe him as being against "abortion rights," as opposed to being against killing unborn babies. And having framed that, they then go on to cite their devil, a conservative blog, as having reported Fred being pro-choice. Just to cover all the bases and discourage everyone from supporting Fred Thompson.
42 posted on
03/27/2007 8:27:38 AM PDT by
Graymatter
(Support FREDeralism in 2008! Draft Fred!)
To: veronica; Howlin; carlo3b; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
46 posted on
03/27/2007 9:00:03 AM PDT by
jellybean
(FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT! Proud to be an Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
To: veronica
Fred would make a good TV President..
BUT Newt would make a good REAL ONE..
59 posted on
03/27/2007 9:16:47 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
